Supply Chain Pricing Strategy for Short-Lived Ramp-Type Demand Models

Article Preview

Abstract:

Natural hazards, such as estern Japan earthquake in 2011 and human-induced crises, such as the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008, is harmful to global supply chain management. Therefore, a need exists to rethink the methodology for responding to crises. It is well known that the bullwhip effect due to order forecasting and demand fluctuations decrease supply chain efficiency. Compared to the conventional bullwhip effects, short-lived demand changes caused by unexpected natural disasters or a financial crisis can adversely affect supply chain performance. This work discusses the effects of four ramp-type demands using a novel supply chain cost model. Ramp-type demand increases within a short period can lead to profit loss; and consequently, an appropriate pricing strategy should be adopted. Based on price elasticity, demand types and their lifetimes, and supply chain parameters, the price premium can be determined to obtain the highest profit. Simulation results provide guidelines for supply chain managers dealing with demand fluctuations due to natural or human-induced crises.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3696-3701

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.C. Papadakis and W.T. Ziemba, Derrivative effects of the 1999 earthquake in Taiwan to US personal computer manufacturers. P.R. Kleindorfer and M.R. Sertel (Eds. ) Mitigation and Financing of Seismic Risks, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2001).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0806-8_14

Google Scholar

[2] P.R. Kleindorfer and H.S. Germaine, Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2005, pp.53-68.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x

Google Scholar

[3] H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan and S. Whang, The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains. Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1997, pp.92-102.

Google Scholar

[4] H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan and S. Whang, Information Distribution in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1997, pp.546-558.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546

Google Scholar

[5] H.L. Lee and S. Whang, Information sharing in a Supply Chain. International Journal Manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol. 20, 2000, pp.373-387.

Google Scholar

[6] H.L. Lee, K.C. So and C.S. Tang, The value of Information sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2000, pp.626-643.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Yu, H. Yan and T.C. E Cheng, Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 121, No. 3, 2001, pp.114-119.

DOI: 10.1108/02635570110386625

Google Scholar

[8] S.M. Disney and D.R. Towill, Vendor-managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 5, (2003).

DOI: 10.1108/01443570310476654

Google Scholar

[9] R.M. Hill, Inventory model for increasing demand followed by level demand. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 46, 1995, p.1250–1259.

DOI: 10.1057/jors.1995.172

Google Scholar

[10] K-S. Wu, An EOQ inventory model for items with Weibull distribution deterioration, ramp-type demand rate and partial backlogging. Production Planning and Control, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2001, p.787–793.

DOI: 10.1080/09537280110051819

Google Scholar

[11] S.K. Manna, and K.S. Chaudhuri, An EOQ model with ramp-type demand rate, time dependent deterioration rate, unit production cost and shortages. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 171, 2006, p.557–566.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.041

Google Scholar

[12] P.S. Deng, R. H-J. Lin and P. Chu, A note on the inventory models for deteriorating items with ramp-type demand rate. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 178, 2007, p.112–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.028

Google Scholar

[13] S. Panda, S. Senapati and M. Basu, Optimal replenishment policy for perishable seasonal products in a season with ramp-type time dependent demand. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 54, 2008, p.301–314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.07.011

Google Scholar

[14] M. Cheng and G. Wang, A note on the inventory model for deteriorating items with trapezoidal type demand rate. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 56, 2009, pp.1296-1300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.07.020

Google Scholar

[15] S.C. Graves, A Single-Item Inventory Model for a Non-Stationary Demand Process. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1999, pp.50-61.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.1.1.50

Google Scholar

[16] H. L Lee and C. Billington, Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1992, 65–73.

Google Scholar

[17] R.I. van Hoek, A. Harrison and M. Christopher, Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain. International Journalof Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, p.126–147.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570110358495

Google Scholar

[18] T.S. Graham, P.J. Dougherty and W.N. Dudley, The long term strategic impact of purchasing partnerships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. Vol. 30, No. 4, 1994, p.13–18.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.1994.tb00269.x

Google Scholar

[19] G. Stewart, Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logistics Information Management. Vol. 8, No. 2, 1995, p.38–44.

DOI: 10.1108/09576059510085000

Google Scholar

[20] J.L. Cavinato, Total cost value model for supply chain competitiveness. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1992, p.285–291.

Google Scholar

[21] A. Gunasekaran, C. Patel and R.E. McGaughey, A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, 2004, p.333.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003

Google Scholar