Fuzzy Evaluation of Maintainability with Tribological Factors at Design Stage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Excellent maintainability is extremely important not only supplementing reliability necessarily but reducing product life cycle cost and enhancing its quality greatly. Industrial experiences have shown that wear and friction related failures of tribological components, are one of the main reasons for maintenance. However, most of the research works evaluated tribo-maintainability at maintenance stages. This paper analyzed the tribo-maintainability related design factors from systematic perspective and concluded a more complete set of six factors. A fuzzy set based approach is then developed to quantitatively evaluate design for its tribo-maintainability. A case study with a common assembly of a gear reducer has demonstrated the effectiveness of the prototype developed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1027-1033

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. A. Slavila, C. Decreuse , M. Ferney. Fuzzy approach for maintainability evaluation in the design process. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications. Vol. 13 (2005), pp.291-300.

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x05059807

Google Scholar

[2] M. F. Wani , O. P. Gandhi. Development of maintainability index for mechanical systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 65(1999), pp.259-270.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(99)00004-6

Google Scholar

[3] L. Zhong , S. Youchao . Research on Maintainability Evaluation Model Based on Fuzzy Theory. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. Vol. 20 (2007), pp.402-407.

DOI: 10.1016/s1000-9361(07)60061-2

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Kimura. Maintenance tribology: its significance and activity in Japan. Wear. Vol. 207(1997), pp.63-66.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07472-8

Google Scholar

[5] K. Holmberg. Reliability aspects of tribology. Tribology International. Vol. 34(2001), pp.801-808.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-679x(01)00078-0

Google Scholar

[6] Z.M. Ge. Wear-resisting Design. China Machine Press, Beijing (1991), pp.20-30. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Kimura. Tribology as a maintenance tool. New Directions in Tribology. (1997), pp.299-308.

Google Scholar

[8] Gruber R. Tribology: the science of keeping bearings running. World Pumps. (2006 ), pp.36-39.

DOI: 10.1016/s0262-1762(06)71146-4

Google Scholar

[9] X.P. Xie. System Development for Maintenance Management of Machinery Based on Tribology[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 12(2001), pp.1063-1066. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] M. F. Wani , O. P. Gandhi. Maintainability design and evaluation of mechanical systems based on tribology. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 77(2002), pp.181-188. Fig. 2 Relative closeness calculation interface of the prototype.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00032-7

Google Scholar

[11] P.L. Hoffman. Converting tribology principles into measurable maintenance improvements at Sishen Iron Ore Mine. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology. Vol. 54(2002), pp.225-233.

DOI: 10.1108/00368790210441483

Google Scholar

[12] L. Chen, J. Cai. Using Vector Projection Method to evaluate maintainability of mechanical system in design review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. Vol. 812003), pp.147-154.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00075-9

Google Scholar

[13] H. Deng, C. H. Yeh, R. J. Willis. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers and Operations Research. Vol. 27(2000), pp.963-973.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00069-6

Google Scholar