Multi-Objective Optimization for Parameters of Energy Management Strategy of HEV Based on Improved NSGA-II

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) provides fairly high fuel economy with lower emissions compared to conventional vehicles. To enhance HEV performance in terms of fuel economy and emissions, subject to the satisfaction of driving performance, multi-objective optimization for parameters of energy management strategy is inevitable. Considering the defect of the method which transfers multi-objective optimization problem into that of single-objective and the shortage of the Pareto-optimum based nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), the NSGA-II has been improved and then applied to the optimization in this paper. The simulation results show that each run of the algorithm can produce many Pareto-optimal solutions and the satisfactory solution can be selected by decision-maker according to the requirement. The results also demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

912-917

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Piccolo, L. Ippolito, V. Galdi, et al, Optimization of energy flow management in hybrid electric vehicles via genetic algorithms, IEEE/ ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Como, Italy, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/aim.2001.936493

Google Scholar

[2] MORTEZA M G, AMIR P, Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of control strategy in parallel hybrid electric vehicles, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2006, pp.420-435.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.02.015

Google Scholar

[3] Pu Jinhuan, Yin Chengliang, Zhang Jianwu, Application of genetic algorithm in optimization of control strategy for hybrid electric vehicles, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol 16, 2005, pp.648-651 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Wu Guangqiang, Chen Huiyong, Multi-objective optimization of HEV parameters based on genetic algorithm, Automotive Engineering, vol 31, 2009, pp.60-64 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] ZHANG Xin, SONG Jianfeng, TIAN Yi, ZHANG Xin, Multi-objective optimization of hybrid electric vehicle control strategy with genetic algorithm, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol 45, 2009, pp.36-40 (in Chinese).

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2009.02.036

Google Scholar

[6] 1. Das, J. Dennis, A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multi criteria optimization problems, Structural Optimization, vol 14, 1997, pp.63-69.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01197559

Google Scholar

[7] LI Xuebin, Study of multi-objective optimization and multi-attribute decision making of economic load dispatch problem, Proceedings of the CSEE, vol 28, 2008, pp.102-107 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Srinivas, K. Deb, Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms, Evolutionary Computation, vol 2, 1994, pp.221-248.

DOI: 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221

Google Scholar

[9] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA 2, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, vol 6, 2002, pp.182-197.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[10] Hu Xiaolin, Wang Zhongfan, Liao Lianying, Xiao Zhiqin, Application of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm in hybrid electric vehicle design and control, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), vol 28, 2004, pp.384-387.

Google Scholar

[11] Fang Licun, Qin Shiyin, Parameters Optimization of hybrid electric vehicle based on multi-objective genetic algorithms, Automotive Engineering, vol 29, 2007, pp.1036-1040 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] C. Desai, S. Williamson, Optimal design of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle using multi-objective genetic algorithms, 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2009, pp.871-876.

DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2009.5289754

Google Scholar

[13] M. Jain, C. Desai, S. Williamson, Genetic algorithm based optimal powertrain component sizing and control strategy design for a fuel cell hybrid electric bus, 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2009, pp.980-985.

DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2009.5289740

Google Scholar

[14] LU WANG, SHENG-WU XIONG, JIE YANG, An improved elitist strategy multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2006, pp.2315-2319.

DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2006.258717

Google Scholar

[15] YU Chun yue, QU Rong xia, Multi-objective order planning model and algorithm for integrated steel production, International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings/ICMSE, 2008, pp.400-405.

DOI: 10.1109/icmse.2008.4668946

Google Scholar

[16] P. Murugan, S. Kannan, S. Baskar, NSGA-II algorithm for multi-objective generation expansion planning problem, Electric Power Systems Research, vol 79, 2009, pp.622-628.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2008.09.011

Google Scholar

[17] P. Murugan, S. Kannan, S. Baskar, Application of NSGA-II algorithm to single-objective transmission constrained generation expansion planning, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol 24, 2009, pp.1790-1797.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2030428

Google Scholar

[18] Mehrdad Ehsani, Yimin Gao, Karen L. Butler, Application of electrically peaking hybrid (ELPH) propulsion system to a full-size passenger car with simulated design verification, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, vol 48, 1999, pp.1779-1787.

DOI: 10.1109/25.806770

Google Scholar

[19] ADVISOR Documentation (Version 2002): National Renewable Energy Laboratory, April, (2002).

Google Scholar

[20] A. Emadi, M. Ehsani, JM. Miller, Vehicular Electric Power Systems: Land, Sea, Air and Space Vehicle, New York Marcel Dekker, (2003).

Google Scholar