Soft Sensing Based on EMD and Improved PSO-SVM

Article Preview

Abstract:

A kind of soft sensing is proposed by combining empirical mode decomposition(EMD) with support vector machine optimized by improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO-SVM). EMD is a highly adaptive decomposition and can decompose any complicated signal into so called Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMF), which not only has excellent performance of feature extraction but also can reduce the dimension of the model input data space. we can extracts IMF energy feature as the input feature vectors of IPSO-SVM. Support vector machine (SVM) has been successfully employed to solve regression problem but it is difficult to select appropriate SVM parameters. A new SVM model based on adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) for parameter optimization is proposed which not only has strong global search capability, but also is very easy to implement. The proposed method is used to build soft sensing of diesel oil solidifying point. Compared with other two models, the result shows that IPSO-SVM approach has a better prediction and generalization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2817-2821

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Shakil, M. Elshafei, M.A. Habib, et al, Soft sensor for NOx and O2 using dynamic neural networks, Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 35, pp.578-586, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2008.08.007

Google Scholar

[2] N. E. Huang, A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 459, pp.2317-2345, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] N. E. Huang, HHT basics and applications-for speech, machine health monitoring, and bio-medical data Analysis, March 24, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Behzad, K. A. Eazi, M, Palhang, Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, pp.7624-7629, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.053

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kennedy, R. C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia, vol. 4, pp.1942-1948, (1995).

Google Scholar

[6] D. W. Boeringer, D. H. Werner, Particle swarm optimization versus genetic algorithms for phased array synthesis, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 52, pp.771-779, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tap.2004.825102

Google Scholar

[7] Data available at http: /software. eigenvector. com/Data/SWRI/index. html.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wang, X. Hu, Application of Mattlab in Vibration Signal Processing, Beijing: China WaterPower Press, pp.78-82, (2006).

Google Scholar