Comparison of Archimedean Screw and Normal Pump in Pumped Storage Generation Combined with Wind Power Generation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Renewable energy resources such as wind energy have a disadvantage that the quality of output power is lower than that of fossil fuel resources. To solve this problem, pumped storage power system with Archimedean screw is designed. The structure and principle of operation are introduced and the advantages and disadvantages are discussed according to the theory and the simulation. In this paper, comparison has been done by collecting and analyzing the data and simulated the system on different condition to show the differences of the two types of pumps working on the pumped storage system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

439-444

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Sugawara, et al., Clean Technology 2011, Renewable Energy Technologies, WE8. 853 (June, 2011, Boston, USA).

Google Scholar

[2] Picture on http: /en. wikipedia. org/wiki/File: Pumpstor_racoon_mtn. jpg.

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. zbbcpump. com/info-18. html.

Google Scholar

[4] Data from private communication.

Google Scholar

[5] Sachi Chiba: Pumped Storage Generation Plant, Denkishoin , (2000/12), pp.13-16. (in Japanese).

Google Scholar

[6] Jin-quan Zhu and Yue-qin Li: Computation and simulation analysis of twin-screw pump efficiency under frequency conversion.

Google Scholar

[7] John S. Anagnostopoulos and Dimitris E. Papantonis, Energy, September 2012, pp.416-423.

Google Scholar

[8] Wolfgang Leiber and Klaus Willibald: High-performance screw pumps, World Pumps, (1995/9), pp.54-58.

DOI: 10.1016/s0262-1762(99)80952-3

Google Scholar

[9] Furkan Dincer: The analysis on wind energy electricity generation status, potential and policies in the world, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (2011/12), pp.5135-5142.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.042

Google Scholar