Analysis on Public Participation in Decision-Making of Nuclear Power in China

Abstract:

In recent years, like many people from other countries, the Chinese people pay close attention to nation’s development and policy of nuclear power, especially after the Fukushima incident. Furthermore, the concerns become exacerbated with the discussion about building the inland nuclear power plant. At the same time, the enthusiasm of the public participation which has its own characteristics has greatly improved in China. There is limited experience in the field of nuclear power decision-making in China. In this context, this paper comprehensive analyzes the Chinese public participation in decision-making of the nuclear power industry, summarizing the characteristics of public participation in this field. Then a typical case analysis with On-site visit and interview is made for verifying our theory. Based on these studies, some suggestions are put forward.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 291-294)
• Pages: 555-560
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.291-294.555
• Online since: February 2013
• Authors: Yun Na Wu, Mandula Naren, Yi Li Han, He Ping Wang
• Keywords: Nuclear Power, Public Participation

References

[1] Germany to shut all nuclear reactors, http: /www. guardian. co. uk/world/2011/may/30/germany-to-shut-nuclear-reactors.

[2] Great importance to nuclear power: French nuclear energy that is not ready to follow the example of Germany, http: /www. chinanews. com/gj/2011/06-01/3081331. shtml.

[3] Embarrassing nuclear power: Europe give up nuclear power, developing countries support it, http: /www. weather. com. cn/climate/qhbhyw/07/1391403_4. shtml.

[4] Y. S Choi., &S. H Lee., &N. Z Cho, B. W Lee. (1998). Development of the public attitude model toward nuclear power in Korea. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 25, 923–936.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(97)00081-9

[5] V.T. Covello. (1983). The perception of technological risks: a literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23. 285–297.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(83)90032-x

[6] James F., Paul S., C. K. Mertz. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 46. 1106-1108.

[7] Teruaki O. (1991) Acellular automation method for the change of public attitude regarding nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 26, 163–205.

DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(91)90034-m

[8] Teruaki O. (1995) Effect of nuclear education on public attitude. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 32. 1027–1038.

[9] Hiroshi Y., Keiji K. (1998). Bayesian analysis of public views on the safety of nuclear developments. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 25, 709–720.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(97)00112-6

[10] Huang X.Y. (2010). The plight of public participation in public decision-making and management strategies -- Guangdong Panyu District, storm, for example waste incineration plants, National Institute of Public Administration, 5. 114-118.

[11] Shi Z.G. &Zhang Z.Y. &Xue L. (2002) Study on risk acceptance of nuclear power. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 22. 3.

[12] Wang Q. (1994) Guidance of Statistic Performance, published by Northeast Financial University Press.

[13] Chai D.J. (2009) Public participation and its development in China. Rally. 4. 32-35.

[14] Nick F. P. &Irene L. &Wouter P. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18. 69-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005

[15] Adam C. &Dan V. &Alexa S. (2011). Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy, 39. 4823-4833.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037

[16] Shu-Yi Liao, Wei-Chun Tseng, Chi-Chung Chen. (2010). Eliciting public preference for nuclear energy against the backdrop of global warming. Energy Policy, 38. 7054-7069.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.025

[17] H. Yamagata. & K. Kanda. (1998). Bayesian analysis of public view in the safety of nuclear development. Nuclear energy, 25. 709-720.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(97)00112-6

[18] L. Sjoberg. (2003). Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration.

[19] Daive B. (2001) Lessons Learned? Selected public acceptance case studies since Three Mile Island. Nuclear Energy, 1. 40.

DOI: 10.1680/nuen.40.1.33.39964

[20] M. Grimston and P. Beck. (2002) Double or Quit? The Global Future of Civil Nuclear Energy, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.

[21] K.J. Lee and Y.E. Lee. (1999) Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy in Korea Proceedings of the Fourth Nuclear Energy Symposium Energy Future in Asia/Pacific Region Taiwan. China.

[22] Zeng G.P. &Wang F. (2008) On the citizens. In perspective the improvement of our public decision-making mechanism. Yunnan Social Science, 3. 14-16.

[23] Yang B. (2008) China will be a total of public participation in decision-making. Master's degree thesis . Shanxi University.

[24] Xielin L. &Lan H.Y. (2005) Decisions on public investment projects of the hearing system. Infrastructure Optimization, 10. 34-36.

[25] http: /finance. sina. com. cn/g/20080113/07444398662. shtml.