Operation Factors of Autotrophic Denitrification with Elemental Sulfur as Terminal Product

Article Preview

Abstract:

An anaerobic membrane bioreactor (UBF) with a total capacity of 3L was employed for treatment of sulfide and nitrate containing wastewater with elemental sulfur as terminal product. The effect of HRT and pH on substrate removal and elemental sulfur accumulation was researched when S/N ratio at 2.5. The influent concentration of S2-/HS- and NO3--N were 110mg•L-1 and 20mg•L-1, respectively, during autotrophic denitrification. When HRT was between 7.41h and 6.83h and pH was between 6 and 7.5, HRT and pH has no effect on NO3--N and sulfide removal ratios, and at 97% and 100%, respectively, but elemental sulfur accumulation ratio was increased to 61% with HRT shorten. And low pH (pH at 7) was conducive to elemental sulfur accumulation with the ratio up to 62%. But further to reduce the pH would lead marginal increase in elemental sulfur accumulation ratio at 65%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1110-1114

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Bahambhani and M. Singh: Journal of Apply Physics, Vol. 71 (1991), p.1872.

Google Scholar

[2] L.W. Deng, Y. Tang and Y. Wu: Shanghai Environmental Science, Vol. 5 (1998), p.35.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Chen, N.Q. Ren and A.J. Wang: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 78(2008), p.1057.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Krishnakumar and V.B. Manilal: Biotechnology Letters, Vol. 21 (1999), p.437.

Google Scholar

[5] A.J. Wang, D.Z. Du and N.Q. Ren: Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A Environmental Science, Vol. 40 (2005), p. (1939).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Cai, P. Zheng and Q. Mahmood: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99 (2008), p.5520.

Google Scholar

[7] J.L. Campos, S. Carvalho and R. Portela: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99 (2008), p.1293.

Google Scholar

[8] R.B. Cardoso, R. Sierra-Alvarez and P. Rowlette: Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 95 (2006), p.1148.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Cai, P. Zheng and B.L. Hu: Journal of Chemical industry and engineering (China), Vol. 59 (2008), p.1264.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Nemati, T. Mazutinec and G.E. Jenneman: Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 26(2001), p.350.

Google Scholar

[11] B. De Gusseme, P. De Schryver, and M. De Cooman: FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 67 (2009), p.151.

Google Scholar

[12] State Environmental Protection Administ ration of China: The Methods of Water and Wastewater Monitor (China Environmental Science Press, China 2002).

Google Scholar

[13] S. An, K. Tang, M. Nemati: Water Research, Vol. 44 (2010), p.1531.

Google Scholar

[14] Q. Mahmood, P. Zheng and J. Cai: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 147 (2007), p.249.

Google Scholar

[15] R. A. Jesus, R. F. Elias and J. Gomez: Water Research, Vol. 38 (2004), p.3313.

Google Scholar

[16] P. A. Wilderer, W. L. Jones and U. Dau: Water Research, Vol. 21 (1987), p.239.

Google Scholar

[17] C. McComas and K.L. Sublette: Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 17(2001), p.439.

Google Scholar