Adsorption Characteristics of Estrone to Aerobic Activated Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

Batch experiments were conducted to measure the sorption capacities of estrone (E1) to aerobic activated sludge. The effect of temperature on E1 sorption was investigated at the temperatures of 5-35oC. The results showed that E1 sorption equilibrium was reached at 15min. E1 sorption on the sludge fitted both Freundlich and linear sorption isotherm models. Distribution coefficients (Kd) of E1 to aerobic inactivated sludge was 546.5 L∙kg-1 at 25oC. The effect of temperature on sorption indicated that lower temperature benefited the sorption. The distribution coefficients (Kd) and sorption rate both decreased with the increased temperature. Kd of E1 to aerobic inactivated sludge was decreased by about 44%; the sorption rate was decreased by about 13% when temperature increased from 5 to 35oC. The specific sorption coefficient KOM or KOC was also used to describe the sorption capacity, which also decreased with increased temperature. Sorption thermodynamics indicated that the sorption process was exothermic and spontaneous.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

12-16

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Arditsoglou and D. Voutsa: Environ Sci Pollut R, vol. 17 (2010), p.529.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Allinson, F. Shiraishi and S. A. Salzman: Arch Environ Con Tox, vol. 58 (2010), p.576.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Hashimoto and T. Murakami: Water Research, vol. 43 (2009), p.573.

Google Scholar

[4] W. X. Shi, L. Z. Wang and D. P. L. Rousseau: Environ Sci Pollut R, vol. 17 (2010), p.824.

Google Scholar

[5] S. P. Singh, A. Azua and A. Chaudhary: Ecotoxicology, vol. 19 (2010), p.338.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Yoon, J. Ryu and J. Oh: Sci Total Environ, vol. 408 (2010), p.636.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Stalter, A. Magdeburg and M . Wagner: Water Research, vol. 45 (2011), p.1015.

Google Scholar

[8] N. Cicek, K. Londry and J. A. Oleszkiewicz: Water Environ. Res., vol. 79 (2007), p.795.

Google Scholar

[9] O. Lorphensri, D. A. Sabatini and T. C. G. Kibbey: Water Research, vol. 41 (2007), p.2180.

Google Scholar

[10] S. K. Khanal, B. Xie and M. L. Thompson: Environ Sci Technol, vol. 40 (2006), p.6537.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Xu, W. F. Harper and D. Y. Zhao: Water Research, vol. 42 (2008), p.3146.

Google Scholar

[12] H. R. Andersen, M. Hansen and J. Kjolholt: Chemosphere, vol. 61 (2005), p.139.

Google Scholar

[13] Q. Zeng, Y. Li and G. Gu: Environ Eng Sci, vol. 26 (2009), p.783.

Google Scholar

[14] U. Suntisukaseam, P. Weschayanwiwat and D. A. Sabatini: Environ Eng Sci, vol. 24 (2007), p.1457.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Clara, B. Strenn and E. Saracevic: Chemosphere, vol. 56 (2004), p.843.

Google Scholar

[16] X. Wang and Jr. Grady: Water Res, vol. 28 (1994), p.1247.

Google Scholar

[17] H. Koyuncu, A. R. Kul and N. Yildiz: J Hazard Mater, vol. 141 (2007), p.128.

Google Scholar