Reducing Energy Consumption for Seawater Desalination through the Application of Reflux-Recycle Concepts from Oil Refining

Article Preview

Abstract:

The application of the concepts in oil and gas distillation to membrane desalination process to lower the energy cost for seawater desalination was studied in this paper. Drawing on the close analogy between multistage RO and conventional distillation separation processes, a hybrid membrane processes employing reflux and recycle concepts was developed. Reflux in membrane processes involves taking a portion of the effluent stream on the high pressure side and sending it to the low pressure side of the membrane, while recycle involves taking a portion of the permeate stream on the low pressure side and sending it to the high pressure side of the membrane. A predictive model was developed to study the effect of reflux and recycle on the specific energy consumption (SEC) and permeate quality when compared to conventional systems. In this study, the water permeability coefficients of membranes and brine recycle ratios were investigated. The results show that the SEC for a hybrid membrane processes comprising of RO and NF membrane was lower than conventional methods with the same recovery and feed concentration, suggesting that it is feasible to apply reflux and recycle concepts of distillation on desalination. Through the careful selection of RO membranes and NF membranes, benefits of reflux and recycle can be enjoyed for seawater desalination.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1456-1462

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hassan and A. Mohammad, EP Patent 1614661. (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Pontie, H. Dach, J. Leparc, M. Hafsi and A. Lhassani: Novel approach combining physico-chemical characterizations and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for brackish water desalination intensification, Desalination. Vol. 221 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.075

Google Scholar

[3] B. Penate and L. Garcia-Rodriguez: Current trends and future prospects in the design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology, Desalination. Vol. 284 (2012), pp.1-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.010

Google Scholar

[4] A. Abbas: Model predictive control of a reverse osmosis desalination unit, Desalination. Vol. 194 (2006), pp.269-280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.033

Google Scholar

[5] D. Akgul, M. Cakmakci, N. Kayaalp and I. Koyuncu: Cost analysis of seawater desalination with reverse osmosis in Turkey, Desalination. Vol. 220 (2008), pp.123-131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.027

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Cerci: Exergy analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in California, Desalination. Vol. 142 (2002), pp.257-266.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00207-2

Google Scholar

[7] S. Bandini, D. Vezzani: Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization, Chemical engineering science, Vol. 58 (2003), pp.3303-3326.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(03)00212-4

Google Scholar