Effect of Interaction between Earthworm and Microbes on the Degradation Time of Agro-Waste

Abstract:

Impact of macro-organisms in biological processes had been considerably studied but some of the discrete interactions that exist between macro- and micro-organisms still remain complex and sometimes elusive. Agro-waste is a type of waste that remains highly inevitable in our society and its disposal is a subject of concern. Therefore, this study aimed to degrade sugarcane bagasse which is a significant agro-waste in Malaysia, while trying to understand the interaction between microbes and earthworm utilized in the bioprocess. Sugarcane bagasse was blended with spent tea in equal ratio before composting with the aid of Eudrilus eugeniae and introduced microbial consortia. Though varied, pH values across the amendments tended towards alkaline state, just as the available Phosphorus (P) and exchangeable Potassium (K) increased in the value. Total organic carbon (TOC) across the amendments showed reduction in value; 47% in TS (tea and sugarcane bagasse), whereas 25% in TS6M (Tea + sugarcane bagasse + 6 microbes) and 68% in TS3M (tea bagasse + 3 microbes). However, weight loss in Eudrilus eugeinae was found to be proportional to the reduced time of degradation. TS3M at 33% worm weight loss was recorded at 11 day degradation time, than TS6M (27%) and TS (16%) that showed 13 and 20 days degradation time respectively. Weight loss in earthworm is correlated with microbial interaction and can be a reflection of rate decomposition of organic components of agro-waste in a vermicomposting process.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 295-298)
• Pages: 1710-1713
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.295-298.1710
• Online since: February 2013
• Authors: Fauziah Shahul Hamid*, Chijioke Uche Emenike, Periatamby Agamuthu
• Keywords: Agro-Waste, Eudrilus eugeinae, Microbial Load, Organic Waste Recycling, Sugarcane Bagasse, Vermicomposting

References

[1] P. Agamuthu. In Asian Perspective. Paper presented at the Inaugural Meeting of first Regional 3R form in Asia. (2009).

[2] E. Smeets, M. Junginya, A. Faaij, A. Walter, P. Dolzan and W. Turkenburg. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(8) (2008) pp.781-813.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.005

[3] P.H.F. Pereira, H.C.J. Voorwald, M.O.H. Cioffi, D.R. Mulinari, S.M. Luiz and M.C.L.P. Da Silva Biores. 6(3) (2011) pp.2471-2482.

[4] B.P. Lavarack, G.J. Griffin, and D. Rodman. Biomass and Bioenergy 23 (2002) pp.367-380.

[5] S.H. Fauziah and P. Agamuthu. Mal J. Sci 28 (22) (2009) pp.135-142.

[6] K.R.S. Bano and G. N. Ganjan. J Soil Biol and Ecol 7(2) (1987) pp.98-104.

[7] R. Kumar, D. Verma, B.L. Singh, U. Kumar and Shweta. Biores Tech 101 (2010) p.6707.

[8] P. M Nedgwa and S.A. Thompson. Biores Tech 76 (2001) p.107 – 112.

[9] M. Bernal, A.F. Navarro, A. Roig, J. Cegara and D. Garcia. Biocycle 6 (2006) p.14 – 18.

[10] E. Benitez, R. Nogales, C. Elvira, G. Masciandaro and B. Ceccanti. Biores Tech 68 (1999) p.297 – 303.

[11] A. Asha, G. Renuka and V. Garg. J Haz Mat. 153(3) (2008) p.1023 – 1030.

[12] C. Edwards and P. Bohlen. Biology and ecology of earthworms. Chapman and Hall, (1972). London, UK.

[13] M. Loquet, M. Vinceslas and J. Roulle. J. App Bioche Biotech 9 (1984) p.377.

[14] J.P. Curry and O. Schmidt. Pedobiol 50(6) (2006) p.463 – 477.

[15] S. Subler and A.S. Kirsch. Biol Fert Soil 26(3) (1998) pp.243-249.