A Portfolio Approach for the Forest Asset Dynamic Management under Stochastic Timber Price and Growth

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considering the valuation of forest stands based on revenue from wood sales, concession policy (such as carbon subsidies) and associated costs, the paper focuses on the stochastic control model to study the forest asset dynamic management. The key contribution is to find the optimal dynamic strategy about harvesting quantity in the continual and multiple periods in conditions of stochastic commodity price and timber growth by using portfolio approach. Finally, an analytical optimal strategy is obtained to analyze the quantification relations through which some important conclusions about the optimal forest management can be drawn.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2338-2342

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Graeme Guthrie, Dinesh Kumareswaran. Carbon Subsidies, Taxes and Optimal Forest Management [J]. Environ Resource Economics, 2008, DOI 10. 1007/s10640-008-9238-4: 1-19.

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9238-4

Google Scholar

[2] Jianwu Xiao, Wenxing Kang, Shaohua Yin. A Stochastic Model and a Portfolio Approach to the Optimal Forest Management[C]. Third International Conference on BusinessIntelligence and Financial Engineering, 2010, 8: 201-204.

DOI: 10.1109/bife.2010.55

Google Scholar

[3] Katia Rocha, Ajax R.B. Moreira, Eustáquio J. Reis, Leonardo Carvalho. The market value of forest concessions in the Brazilian Amazon: a Real Option approach [J], Forest Policy and Economics, 2006, 8: 149-160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.05.008

Google Scholar

[4] Zuzana Chladná. Determination of optimal rotation period under stochastic wood and carbon prices[J], Forest Policy and Economics, 2007, 9: 1031-1045.

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.09.005

Google Scholar

[5] Margaret Insley. A Real Options Approach to the Valuation of a Forestry Investment [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002, 44: 471 -492.

DOI: 10.1006/jeem.2001.1209

Google Scholar

[6] Luis H.R. Alvarez, Erkki Koskela. Optimal harvesting under resource stock and price uncertainty [J], Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2007, 31: 2461-2485.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2006.08.003

Google Scholar

[7] Fadian Lu, Peichen Gong. Optimal stocking level and final harvest age with stochastic prices[J], Journal of Forest Economics, 2003, 9: 119-136.

DOI: 10.1078/1104-6899-00026

Google Scholar

[8] Randall Morck, Eduardo Schwartz, David Stangeland. The Valuation of Forestry Resources under Stochastic Prices and Inventories[J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1989, 24(4): 473-487.

DOI: 10.2307/2330980

Google Scholar

[9] M.C. Insley T.S. Wirjanto. Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: contingent claims versus dynamic programming, Discussion paper, 2008, 3: 1-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.002

Google Scholar

[10] Jianwu Xiao, Hong Zhai, Chenglin Qin. The Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Model and Legendre Transform-Dual Solution for Annuity Contracts [J], Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2007, 40(2): 302-310.

DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.04.007

Google Scholar

[11] Jianwu Xiao, Shaohua Yin, Chenglin Qin. The Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Model and The Analytical Strategies for Annuity Contracts [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2006, 27(11): 1499-1506.

DOI: 10.1007/s10483-006-1107-z

Google Scholar