Unified Fracturing Design for Water Injection Well under Steady State Flow Regime

Article Preview

Abstract:

Unified Fracture Design for fracturing optimization is a simple and reliable way to push the limit of the injection ability, reported frequently in recent years. However, most studies focus on fracture design under pseudo-steady state flow regime. The analysis of the different pressure systems between water injection well and oil production well tells us that the steady flow regime in the formation takes up most life span of water injection wells, associated with the field experience. To maximize injection capability for fractured vertical water wells under this regime, a physical optimization method is developed based on the concept of proppant number. Meanwhile, two new type curves without consideration of formation damage are obtained for quantifying the correlation between dimensionless injectivity and dimensionless conductivity. Then, calibrated design procedures accounting for gel damage and non-darcy effect, are also proposed. Finally, sensitivity studies are addressed to clarify the effect of several variables on the optimum fracture geometry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3175-3182

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wenrui Hu: The Present and Future of Low Permeability Oil and Gas in China [J]. China Petroleum Enterprise. Vol. 11 (2009), pp.29-37 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] F.R. Chaban, L.C. Jordan, K.M. Annadorai, T.W. Wilkinson and P. Myers: Integrated Field Optimization Strategy Applied to an Offshore Water Injection Project[R]. Paper SPE 147552 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver (2011).

DOI: 10.2118/147552-ms

Google Scholar

[3] M.J. Economides and M. Nikolaou: Technologies for Oil and Gas Production: Present and Future [J]. AIChE Journal. Vol. 57 (2011), p.1974-(1982).

DOI: 10.1002/aic.12714

Google Scholar

[4] Feng Zhang: The Mechanism and Parameters-optimization of Injection Fracture Pressure Propagation for Low Permeability Oil Field [D]. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Engineer of China University of Petroleum (2009) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] J.A. Daal and M.J. Economides: Optimization of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Irregularly Shaped Drainage Areas [R]. Paper SPE 98047 presented at the 2006 International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/98047-ms

Google Scholar

[6] W.J. McGuire and V.J. Sikora: The Effect of Vertical Fractures on Well Productivity [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 12(1960), pp.72-74.

DOI: 10.2118/1618-g

Google Scholar

[7] M.J. Economides, R. Oligney and P.P. ValkÓ: Unified Fracture Design [M]. Orsa Press, Texas, (2002), in press.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Fan, B.N. Markitell, B.D. Marple and P.P. ValkÓ:Evaluation of Frac-and-Pack Completions in the Eugene Island [R]. Paper SPE 63107 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas (2000).

DOI: 10.2118/63107-ms

Google Scholar

[9] A.S. Demarchos, M.J. Economides, J.M. Mach and D.S. Wolcott: Pushing the Limits in Hydraulic Fracture Design [R]. Paper SPE 86483 presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, (2004).

DOI: 10.2118/86483-ms

Google Scholar

[10] I.R. Diyashev, Sibneft and M.J. Economides: A General Approach To Well Evaluation [R]. Paper SPE 94644 presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, cheveningen, (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Wei and M.J. Economides: Transverse Hydraulic Fractures From a Horizontal Well[R]. Paper SPE 94671 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] A.S. Demarchos, M.M. Porcu and M.J. Economides: Transversely Multi-fractured Horizontal Wells: A Recipe for Success[R]. Paper SPE 102262 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/102263-ru

Google Scholar

[13] D.J. Romero, P.P. ValkÓ and M.J. Economides: Optimization of the Productivity Index and the Fracture Geometry of a Stimulated Well With Fracture Face and Choke Skins [J]. SPE Production & Facilities, Vol. 18(2003), pp.57-64.

DOI: 10.2118/81908-pa

Google Scholar

[14] H.D. Lopez-Hernandez, P.P. ValkÓ and T.T. Pham: Optimum Fracture Treatment Design Minimizes the Impact of Non-Darcy Flow Effects [R]. Paper SPE 90915 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, (2004).

DOI: 10.2118/90195-ms

Google Scholar

[15] Yang Mei and M.J. Economides: Revisiting Natural Proppants for Hydraulic Fracture Production Optimization [R]. Paper SPE 151934 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Woodlands, (2012).

DOI: 10.2118/151934-ms

Google Scholar

[16] L.H. Cinco and V.F. Samaniego: Transient Pressure Behavior for a Well with a Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture [J]. SPE Journal, Vol. 18(1978), pp.253-264.

DOI: 10.2118/6014-pa

Google Scholar

[17] M.C. Vincent, C.M. Pearson and J. Kullman: Non-Darcy and Multiphase Flow in Propped Fractures: Case Studies Illustrate the Dramatic Effect on Well Productivity[R]. Paper SPE 54630 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, (1999).

DOI: 10.2118/54630-ms

Google Scholar

[18] M. Richardson: A New and Practical Method for Fracture Design and Optimization [R]. Paper SPE 59736 presented at the SPE/CERI Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, (2000).

Google Scholar

[19] R.D. Barree, S.A. Cox, V.L. Barree and M.W. Conway: Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Selection [R]. Paper SPE 84306 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, (2003).

DOI: 10.2118/84306-ms

Google Scholar