[1]
Ozken.Z., Raghavan R. New solution for Well test Analysis Problems: part I -Analytical Considerration. 1991a. 6 (3): 359-368 (SPE 18615).
Google Scholar
[2]
Ozken.Z., Raghavan R. New solution for Well test Analysis Problems: part II -Computation Considerration. 1991b. 6 (3): 369-377 (SPE 18616).
Google Scholar
[3]
Ozken.Z., Raghavan R. New solution for Well test Analysis Problems: part III -Additional Algorithms, 258-269 October 1994, New Orleans, LA (SPE 28424).
Google Scholar
[4]
REN G L, LI Z P, ZHANG Y L et al. Stress Sensitivity of Permeability Affected to Production Capacity of Coal Bed Methane Well. Coal Science and Technology . 2012. 4(40): 104-107. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[5]
Liao X W, Lin J E. The Application of Well Test Information to Performance Analysis. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field,. 1994. 1(4): 36-41. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[6]
He w, Feng X, Zhong F X. Discussion on The Special PercolationMechanism of Low Permeability Reservoir and The Performance Characteristics of Low Permeability Gas Well. Natural gas industry. 22 (S1): 91-94. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[7]
Xu Y G, Zeng Y Q, Li G Q. Dynamic Evaluation of Development Feasibility in Extra-low Permeability Reservoirs. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute. 2004. 26(2): 91-93. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[8]
Mao X, Feng W G, Yang Qet al. Calculation Method for Fractal Relative Permeability . Petroleum Geology and Engineering. 2011. 25(6)90-95. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[9]
Shi L N , Tong D K. Pressure dynam ic analysis of dual-porosity model for deformed media with borehole storage. Petroleum Geology & Oil field Development in Daqing. 2005. 24 (2): 50-54 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[10]
Duan Y G, Huang C, Cheng W, et al. Pressure transient analysis for naturally fractured reservoir with stress sensitivity. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institut. 2001. 23 (5): 19-22 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[11]
Bourdet D (French), Zhang Y T etc translate: Modern well test model and application. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2007. 156-158 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[12]
Guo Y C, Lu D T, Zeng Q H, et al. The mathematical model of seepage with a start-up pressure gradient. Journal of University of science and technology of China. 2005. 35 (4): 492-498 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[13]
Abramowitz M. and Stegun I A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1972. 479-480.
Google Scholar
[14]
Gringarten A, and Ramey H. The use of the source and green's function in solving unsteady-flow problems in reservoirs. SPEJ. 285-295 October (1973).
DOI: 10.2118/3818-pa
Google Scholar
[15]
Grader, A S. New solutions for two-well systems with applications to interference slug and constant rate tests and linear boundary detection. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1-17 September 1990, New Orleans, LA (SPE20553).
DOI: 10.2118/20553-ms
Google Scholar
[16]
Bourgeois M, Aquitaine E and Horne R N. Well Test Model Recognition Using LaPlace Space Type Curves. presented at the 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of Society of Petroleum Engineers, 6-9 October 1991, Dallas, Texas (SPE22682).
Google Scholar
[17]
Dai Q, Duan Y G, Chen W, et al. Seepage research status of low permeability gas reservoirs. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs. 2007. 14 (1): 11-14 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[18]
Liao X W, Shen P P. Modern well test analysis. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2002. 95-99 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[19]
Jia Y L, Zhao B R. Laplace transform and numerical inversion in well test analysis of application. Natural gas industry. 1992. 12 (1): 60-64. (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
[20]
Huang Y L, Jiang P X, Qing R N. Gas flow resistance research in tiny porous media. Journal of engineering thermal physical. 2009. 30 (8): 1360-1362 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar