Calculation Methods of the Dynamic Reserves for Gas Wells in a Low-Permeability Gas Reservoir

Article Preview

Abstract:

Accurately calculating dynamic reserves for single well in a low-permeability gas reservoir has an important guiding significance to high efficiency development of the gas reservoir. During the development of the gas reservoir, dynamic analysis methods were often used to calculate dynamic reserves. Dynamic analysis methods mainly include the material balance method, the gas production method in unit pressure drop, the flexible two-phase method and the production unstable method. Dynamic reserves for four types of gas wells in a low-permeability gas field were calculated using these four methods. Calculation results show that dynamic reserves from big to small are respectively obtained using material balance method, gas production method in unit pressure drop, flexible two-phase method and production unstable method. Calculating dynamic reserves obtained by flexible two-phase method and production unstable method are utilized to production dynamic data of gas well, and those obtained by material balance method and gas production method in unit pressure drop are utilized to the reservoir parameters of different state. Therefore, the values of dynamic reserves obtained using flexible two-phase method and production unstable method in the low-permeability gas reservoir may be more accurate than those obtained using the other methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3243-3248

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li, S.L., 2008. Natural gas engineering. Petroleum Industry Press.

Google Scholar

[2] Chen, Y.Q., 2005. The practice of oil and gas reservoir engineering. Petroleum Industry Press.

Google Scholar

[3] Xu, W.Z., Chen, H.F., Liu S.J., etc. 2009. Implementation and evaluation of gas well movable reserves. Petrochemical industry application. Vol. 28 No. 7: 61-65.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen, Y.Q. andYan, W.G., 2003. Application of pressure fall-off curves in volumetric gas reservoir. Xinjiang petroleum geology. Vol. 24 No. 6: 555-558.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu, S.D., Li, S.C., Ding, X.F., etc. 2011. A new method of determining original gas in-place. Fault-block oil & gas field. Vol. 18 No. 6: 750-753.

Google Scholar

[6] Li, C.L., 2002. Theoretical study of production indicative curves from gas reservoir. Xinjiang petroleum geology. Vol. 23 No. 3: 236-238.

Google Scholar

[7] Lu, X.M., 1999. Dynamic prediction research for gas reservoir using material balance method. Natural Gas Exploration & Development., Vol. 22 No. 3: 29-39.

Google Scholar

[8] Chen, Y.Q., 1999. The effect of pressure survey errors on forecasting the reserves of a constant volume gas reservoir. Well testing. Vol. 8 No. 3: 1-4.

Google Scholar

[9] Chen, W., Zhu, D. and Hill, A.D., A comprehensive model of multilateral well deliverability. 2000, SPE64751.

Google Scholar

[10] Chen, H. Y. and Asaad, N., Horizontal-Well productivity equations with both uniform-flux and uniform-pressure wellbore modes. 2005, SPE 97190.

DOI: 10.2118/97190-ms

Google Scholar