Integrating Environmental Assessment of Failure Modes in Maintenance Planning of Production Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

Apart from preventing and controlling economical, technical and safety impacts of failures, so to reduce at best production losses, maintenance target is to systematically check and improve the allocation and usage of resources in order to assure quality of products and processes. At the same time, consumption of resources and their relative environmental impacts are becoming a central issue in the new international regulations and standards for sustainable manufacturing. On these considerations, the paper proposes an innovative methodology that, starting from the principles of FMECA (Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis), extends its own concepts with the introduction of a specific index to measure environmental effects of failures. Starting from the traditional definition of the RPN (Risk Priority Number) of a failure mode, the approach defines a new indicator (Environmental Indicator) to extend the results of FMECA and take in consideration the most critical issues of environmental protection: consumption of materials, emissions and wastes, lifespan of systems. Using this tool, maintenance scheduling can be defined considering also an environmental perspective. The methodology is tested on the maintenance program of a manufacturing line in a pharmaceutical production system and results are compared to the one obtained using a traditional FMECA approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

651-660

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.E. Porter and C. van der Linde: Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review September-October (1995), pp.120-134.

Google Scholar

[2] A.M. Deif: A System Model for Green Manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 19 (2011), pp.1553-1559.

Google Scholar

[3] S.A. Melnyk, R.P. Sroufe and R. Calantone: Assessing the Impact of Environmental Management Systems on Corporate and Environmental Performance. Journal of Operations Management Vol. 21 (2003), pp.329-351.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00109-2

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Roy and R. Vezina: Environmental Performance as a Basis for Competitive Strategy: Opportunities and Threats. Journal of Corporate Environmental Strategy Vol. 8 (2001), pp.339-347.

DOI: 10.1016/s1066-7938(01)00118-x

Google Scholar

[5] V. Lofthouse: Ecodesign Tools for Designers: Defining the Requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 14 (2006), pp.1386-1395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.013

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Matos and M.H. Simplicio: Innovation and Sustainability in Mechanical Design Through Materials Selection. Materials and Design Vol. 27 (2006), pp.74-78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.09.023

Google Scholar

[7] A. Kengpol and P. Boonkanit. The Decision Support Framework for Developing Eco-Design at Conceptual Phase Based upon ISO/TR14062. International Journal of Production Economics Vol. 131 (2011), pp.4-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.006

Google Scholar

[8] T. Pereira. Sustainability: an Integral Engineering Design Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Vol. 13 (2009), pp.1133-1137.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.05.003

Google Scholar

[9] A. Azapagic, A. Millington and A. Collett. A Methodology for Integrating Sustainability Considerations into Process Design. Chemical Engineering Research and Design Vol. 84 (2006), pp.439-452.

DOI: 10.1205/cherd05007

Google Scholar

[10] V. Venkatasubramanian. Prognostic and Diagnostic Monitoring of Complex Systems for Product Lifecycle Management: Challenges and Opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering Vol. 29 (2005), pp.1253-1263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.02.026

Google Scholar

[11] A.R. Hale, B.H.J. Heming and K. Smit. Evaluating Safety in The Management of Maintenance Activities in the Chemical Process Industry. Safety Science Vol. 28 (1998), pp.21-44.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00061-1

Google Scholar

[12] C.G. Vassiliadis and E.N. Pistikopoulos. Maintenance-Based Strategies for Environmental Risk Minimization in the Process Industries. Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 71 (2000), pp.481-501.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00095-3

Google Scholar

[13] M. Bertolini, M. Bevilacqua, F.E. Ciarapica and G. Giacchetta. Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance Procedures for an Oil Refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Vol. 22 (2009), pp.244-253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.01.003

Google Scholar

[14] G. Zwetsloot. Improving Cleaner Production by Integration into the Management of Quality, Environment and Working Conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 3 (1995), pp.61-66.

DOI: 10.1016/0959-6526(95)00046-h

Google Scholar

[15] M. Garetti and M. Taisch. Sustainable Manufacturing: Trends and Research Challenges. Production Planning & Control Vol. 1 (2011), pp.1-22.

Google Scholar

[16] M. Ben-Daya, S.O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic and D. Ait-Kadi: Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering (Springer, Germany 2009).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0

Google Scholar

[17] D.R.K. Dhir, M. D. Newlands and T.D. Dyer: Sustainable Waste Management (Thomas Telford, United Kingdom 2003).

Google Scholar

[18] T.L. Saaty and L.G. Vargas. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Vol. 34 (2001), pp.27-46.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_2

Google Scholar