Design of an Ultrasonic Blade for Cutting Bone

Article Preview

Abstract:

Damaging temperature effects observed during ultrasonic cutting operations are typically a result of friction between the vibrating blade and material, and combustion of debris. In order to prevent the high temperatures causing damage, the ultrasonic blade has to cut with a sufficient speed. This can be achieved either by applying a relatively high static load or by increasing the working vibration amplitude of the cutting edge, however, the result can be poor operational control and exceeding the fatigue limit of the blade, respectively. In this paper, the effect of blade tip profile is considered, particularly with reference to the influence of the cutting edge contact area on temperature under different static loading conditions. Titanium blades, with different cutting edge profiles are tested in a series of experiments that monitor cutting speed, static load, temperature around the cut site, and vibration amplitude at the cutting edge. The blades are tested cutting bovine femur and artificial bone material, and the cut surfaces are examined for signs of damage after each test. The experimental data reveal that blades with a small cutting edge contact area cut at a lower temperature, and that signs of thermal damage are less evident.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

79-84

Citation:

Online since:

August 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Cardoni, M. Lucas: Enhanced vibration performance of ultrasonic block horns, Ultrasonics, Vol. 40, pp.365-369 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(02)00123-3

Google Scholar

[2] J.Y. Giraud, S. Villemin, R. Daramana, J. Ph. Cahuzac, A. Autefage and J.P. Morucci: Bone cutting, Review Article, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., Vol. 12, No 1, pp.1-19 (1991).

DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/12/1/001

Google Scholar

[3] M.V. Volkov, I.S. Shepeleva: The use of ultrasonic instrumentation for the transaction and uniting of bone tissue in orthopaedic surgery, Reconstr. Surg. Traumat., Vol. 14, pp.147-152 (1974).

Google Scholar

[4] D. Sun, Z.Y. Zhou, Y.H. Lui, W.Z. Shen: Development and application of ultrasonic surgical instruments, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp.462-467 (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/10.581934

Google Scholar

[5] T. Aoki, S. Kaseda: Thoracoscopic resection of the lung with the ultrasonic scalpel, Annals of Thorac. Surg., Vol. 67, pp.1181-1183 (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00134-4

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lucas, A. Cardoni, A. MacBeath: Temperature effects in ultrasonic cutting of natural materials, Annals of CIRP, Vol. 54/1, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60082-1

Google Scholar

[7] L.G. Merkulov: Theory of ultrasonic concentrators, Soviet Physical Acoustics, Vol. 3, pp.230-238 (1957).

Google Scholar

[8] P. Schwaller, P. Gröning, A. Shneuwly, P. Boschung, E. Müller, M. Blanc, L. Schlapbach: Surface and friction characterization by thermoelectric measurements during ultrasonic friction processes, Ultrasonics, Vol. 38, pp.212-214 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(99)00062-1

Google Scholar

[9] A.R. Williams, A.D. Walmsley: Exposimetry of low-frequency ultrasonic dental devices, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferr. and Freq. Control, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.264-269 (1988).

DOI: 10.1109/58.4176

Google Scholar

[10] M.M. Malawer, J. Bickels, I. Meller, R.G. Buch, R.M. Henshaw, Y. Kollender: Cryosurgery in the treatment of giant cell tumor, A long term followup study, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 359, pp.176-188 (1999).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00019

Google Scholar