Hydrogen Permeation Behavior through HSLA Steels and its Implications on Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to investigate the susceptibility of HSLA steels to hydrogen embrittlement (HE) when cathodic protection system was applied, a new electrochemical hydrogen permeation test method was performed to measure the hydrogen permeation current behavior through X65 steel and X80 steel in artificial seawater with different polarized potentials. Besides, slow strain rate test (SSRT) was introduced to study the effect of penetrated hydrogen atoms on the HE susceptibility of the steels. Results showed that with the decrease of the polarized potential, the sub-surface hydrogen concentration in the steels became higher and higher, and the corresponding HE susceptibility increased as well. What’s more, the X80 steel was more vulnerable to HE, and that owns to the minor grain size and M-A microstructure, which may trap more hydrogen atoms, and thus led to the HE susceptibility difference between the two steels. All these findings would be used as guidance when cathodic protection were carried out for offshore HSLA steel structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

310-316

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Hardie, E.A. Charles. A.H. Lopez. Hydrogen embrittlement of high strength pipeline steels. Corrosion Science, 48(12), (2006), 4378-4385.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.02.011

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Arafin, J.A. Szpunar. Effect of bainitic microstructure on the susceptibility of pipeline steels to hydrogen induced cracking. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 528(15), (2011), 4927-4920.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.036

Google Scholar

[3] T.Y. Jin, Z.Y. Liu, Y.F. Cheng. Effect of non-metallic inclusions on hydrogen-induced cracking of API5L X100 steel. Hydrogen Energy, 35(15), (2010), 8014-8021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.089

Google Scholar

[4] M. Cabrini, S. Lorenzi, P. Marcassoli, et al. Hydrogen embrittlement behavior of HSLA line pipe steel under cathodic protection. Corrosion Reviews, 29(5-6), (2011), 261-274.

DOI: 10.1515/corrrev.2011.009

Google Scholar

[5] Gyu Tae Park, Sung Ung Koh, Hwan Gyo Jung, et al. Effect of microstructure on the hydrogen trapping efficiency and hydrogen induced cracking of linepipe steel. Corrosion Science, 50(7), (2008), 1865-1871.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.007

Google Scholar

[6] Kumkum Banerjee, U.K. Chatterjee. Hydrogen permeation and hydrogen content under cathodic charging in HSLA 80 and HSLA 100 steels. Scripta Materialia, 44(2), (2001), 213-216.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(00)00594-7

Google Scholar

[7] F. Huang, J. Liu, Z.J. Deng, et al. Effect of microstructure and inclusions on hydrogen induced cracking susceptibility and hydrogen trapping efficiency of X120 pipeline steel. Material Science and Engineering, 527(26), (2010), 6997-7001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.022

Google Scholar

[8] Thorsten Michler, Joerg Naumann. Microstructural aspects upon hydrogen environment embrittlement of various bcc steels. Hydrogen energy, 35(2), (2010), 821-832.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.092

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM D 1141-98 Standard practice for the preparation of substitute ocean water (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] ISO 17081 Method of measurement of hydrogen permeation and determination of hydrogen uptake and transport in metals by an electrochemical technique (2004).

DOI: 10.3403/03156264

Google Scholar

[11] Lin Zhaoqiang, Ma Li, Yan Yonggui. Effects of cathodic polarization on the hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity of welding line in high strength hull structural steel. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, 31(1), (2011), 46-50.

Google Scholar