The Measurements of Friction Coefficient on Ramps among Different Floor Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates the influences of slopes on objective friction measurements of different floor materials. It is known that a person is more likely to slip when walking on a slope than when walking on a level surface. In term of the prevention of falls for elders and MMH (manual material handling) workers, slope is more commonly in the design of barrier-free environments. However, it could be a potential environmental risk of slip accidents. The environmental problems were generally caused by poor floor slipperiness. The coefficient of friction (COF) is one of important objective indexes to assess floor slipperiness. It is worthy to investigate that the influences of slope on COF. Thus, COF measurements under different slopes, floor materials and surface conditions were conducted in this study. The data were analyzed to investigate the influence of slope on objective friction measurements of floors. The results showed that the rougher surface and dry conditions had the higher COF values. The different slopes result in significant COF values; however, there is no significant trend. Therefore, there should be more warning signs and slip resistance facilities or accessories to reduce the chance to slip and fall on the slopes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

790-793

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.A. Haslam and T.A. Bentley, Follow-up investigations of slip, trip and fall accidents among postal delivery workers. Safety Science, Vol. 32 (1999), pp.33-47.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(99)00009-0

Google Scholar

[2] J.P. Hanson, M.S. Redfern and M. Mazumdar, Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics, Vol. 42 (1999), pp.1619-1633.

DOI: 10.1080/001401399184712

Google Scholar

[3] M.S. Redfern and J. DiPasquale, Biomechanics of descending ramps. Gait and Postures, Vol. 6 (1997), pp.119-125.

DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(97)01117-x

Google Scholar

[4] R. Cham and M.S. Redfern, Heel contact dynamics during slip events on level and inclined surfaces. Safety Science, Vol. 40 (2002), pp.559-576.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(01)00059-5

Google Scholar

[5] J. Sun, M. Walters and N. Svensson, Lloyd, D. The influence of surface slope on human gait characteristics: a study of urban pedestrians walking on an inclined surface. Ergonomics, Vol. 39 (1996), pp.677-692.

DOI: 10.1080/00140139608964489

Google Scholar

[6] R. Cham and M.S. Redfern, Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. Gait Posture, Vol. 15 (2002), pp.159-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00150-3

Google Scholar

[7] W.R. Chang, R. Grönqvist, S. Leclercq and R. Myung, Makkonen, L., Strandberg, L., Brungraber, R.J., Mattke, U., Thorpe, S.C. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions. Ergonomics, Vol. 44 (2001).

DOI: 10.1080/00140130110085574

Google Scholar

[8] W.R. Chang, The Effect of Slip Criterion and Time on Friction Measurement. Safety Science, Vol. 40 (2002), pp.593-611.

Google Scholar

[9] T.E. Lockhart, An integrated approach towards identifying age-related mechanisms of slip initiated falls. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 18 (2008), pp.205-217.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.006

Google Scholar

[10] K.W. Li, W.R. Chang, J.C. Wei and C.H. Kuo, Friction measurements on ramps using the Brungraber Mark II slipmeter. Safety Science, Vol. 45 (2006), pp.375-386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.11.003

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM E303-93 Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester. Book of Standards, Volume: 04. 03, USA (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/e0303

Google Scholar

[12] K.W. Li, Y.W. Hsu, W.R. Chang and C.H. Lin, Friction Measurements on Three Commonly used Floors on a College Campus Under Dry, Wet, and Sand-Covered Conditions. Safety Science, Vol. 45 (2007), pp.980-992.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.030

Google Scholar

[13] R. Grönqvist, M. Hirvonen and A. Tohv, Evaluation of three portable floor slipperiness testers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 25 (1999), pp.85-95.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(98)00101-2

Google Scholar

[14] American National Standard InstituteStandard for the Provision of Slip Resistance on Walking/ Working Surfaces. American National Standard Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) A 1264. 2, ASSE, Des Plaines, Illinois (2001).

Google Scholar

[15] W.R. Chang, The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Measurements of Slip Resistance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 24 (1999), pp.299-313.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(98)00038-9

Google Scholar

[16] W.R. Chang, I.J. Kim, D.P. Manning and B. Bunterngchit, The Role of Surface Roughness in the Measurement of Slipperiness. Ergonomics, Vol. 44 (2001), pp.1200-1216.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130110085565

Google Scholar