Structure and Lattice Expansion of Pure Sodium Confined inside Nanoporous Vycor Glass at Low Temperatures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Behavior of sodium metal subject to geometrical constraints has been studied at variable temperatures. A porous medium, Vycor glass of an average pore size of 9.2 nm, was loaded with Na by vacuum vaporization. Synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction of the specimen revealed the existence of close-packed phases such as FCC, HCP, 9R and 4H already at room temperature whereas the bulk BCC phase of Na was completely absent. In contrast, close-packed phases in bulk sodium are only observed at temperatures below 35 K upon cooling. This result can be qualitatively understood in view of earlier zero Kelvin calculations from which it is well known that the differences of structural energies between BCC and close-packed phases are very small. As a consequence, also various close-packed structures can be formed at ambient temperature under certain conditions and environments. The lattice expansion in the restricted geometry has been determined in the range of 160 K to 300 K and compared with the bulk metal. Confined Na exhibits smaller lattice expansion as compared to that of the bulk which likewise can be explained as being due to confinement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

93-97

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Berliner, O. Fajen, H.G. Smith and R.L. Hitterman, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 141 (1989), 12086

Google Scholar

[2] A.W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 53 (1984), 64

Google Scholar

[3] O. Blaschko, V. Dmitriev, G. Krexner and P. Tolédano, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 59 (1999), 9095

Google Scholar

[4] O. Blaschko and G. Krexner, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 30 (1984), 1667

Google Scholar

[5] W. Schwarz, O. Blaschko and I. Gorgas, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 46 (1992), 14448

Google Scholar

[6] G. Ernst, C. Artner, O. Blaschko and G. Krexner, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 33 (1986), 6465

Google Scholar

[7] K. Knorr, P. Huber and D. Wallacher, Z. Phys. Chem. Vol. 222 (2008), 257

Google Scholar

[8] H. Thompson, A.K. Soper, M.A. Ricci, F. Bruni and N.T. Skipper, J. Phys. Chem. B Vol. 111 (2007), 5610

Google Scholar

[9] E. Charnaya, C. Tien, W. Wang, M. Lee, D. Miche, D. Yaskov, S. Sun and Y. Kumzerov, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 72 (2005), 035406

Google Scholar

[10] H.K. Christenson, J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. 13 (2001), R95-R133

Google Scholar

[11] W. Frank, C. Elsasser and M. Fähnle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995), 1791-1794

Google Scholar

[12] D.L. Price, K.S. Singwi and M.P. Tosi, Phys. Rev. B Vol. 2 (1970), 2983

Google Scholar

[13] V.G. Vaks, M.I. Katsnelson, V.G. Koreshkov, A.I. Likhtenstein, O.E. Parfenov, V.F. Skok, V.A. Sukhoparov, A.V. Trefilov and A.A. Chernyshov, J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. Vol. 1 (1989), 5319

DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/1/32/001

Google Scholar

[14] R.O. Jones, A.I. Lichtenstein and J. Hutter, J. Chem. Phys. Vol. 106 (1997), 4566

Google Scholar

[15] P.B. Balbuena and J.M. Seminario, Nanomaterials: Design and simulation, (Elsevier B.V., 2007)

Google Scholar

[16] S. Lowell, J.E. Shields, M.A. Thomas and M. Thommes, Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density-4th Ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004)

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2303-3

Google Scholar

[17] P. Huber, S. Grüner, C. Schäfer, K. Knorr and A.V. Kityk, Europ. Phys. J. Special Topics Vol. 141 (2007), 101

Google Scholar

[18] H. Abe, K.I. Ohshima and T. Suzuki, J. Appl. Crystall. Vol. 27 (1994), 1040

Google Scholar

[19] W.F. Brace and J.B. Walsh, American Mineralogist Vol. 47 (1962), 1111.

Google Scholar