Enhanced Heterotrophic Denitrification for the Treatment of Nitrate Contaminated Groundwater by Wheat Straw

Article Preview

Abstract:

The method of the heterotrophic denitrification remediation of nitrate-polluted groundwater involves the study of organic carbon sources as electron donor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate wheat straw for its ability to enhance denitrification in column experiments. The inlet concentration was 50.0 mgNO3--N/L and the column operated at the flow rate of 2.0 ml/min. The result showed that in the presence of wheat straw, highly reducing conditions were generated and complete removal of nitrate (>95%) was achieved, with less accumulation of nitrite. Consequently, wheat straw is an attractive carbon source for groundwater denitrification.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

625-628

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. M. Patterson, M. E. Grassi, G. B. Davis, B. S. Robertson and A. J. McKinley: Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36(2002), p.3439

Google Scholar

[2] C Della Rocca, V Belgiorno, S Meriç: Water SA, vol. 31(2005), p.229

Google Scholar

[3] C. Su, R. W. Puls: Chemosphere, vol. 66(2006), p.91

Google Scholar

[4] C. Schubert, L. Knobeloch, M. S. Kanarek and H. A. Anderson: Arch Environ Health, vol. 54(1999), p.242

Google Scholar

[5] J. Sandor, I. Kiss, O. Farkas and I. Ember: European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 17(2001), p.443

Google Scholar

[6] World Health Organization, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, incorporating first and second addenda, Volume 1, third ed, Recommendations, Geneva, (2008)

Google Scholar

[7] S. H. Lin, C. L. Wu: Water Research, vol. 30(1996), p.1851

Google Scholar

[8] A. Kapoor, T. Viraraghavan: Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 123(1997), p.371

Google Scholar

[9] S. J. Ergas, D. E. Rheinheimer: Water Research, vol. 38(2004), p.3225

Google Scholar

[10] S. Seitzinger, J. A. Harrison, J. K. Böhlke, A. F. Bouwman, R. Lowrance, B. Peterson, C. Tobias and G. V. Drecht: Ecological Applications, vol. 16(2006), p.(2064)

DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[11] M. O. Rivett, S. R. Buss, P. Morgan, J. W. N. Smith and C. D. Bemment: Water Research, vol. 42(2008), p.4215

Google Scholar

[12] M. E. Bedessem, T. V. Edgar, R. Roll: J Environ Qual, vol. 34(2005), p.936

Google Scholar

[13] M. Christensson, E. Lie, T. Welande: Water Science and Technology, vol. 30(1994), p.83

Google Scholar

[14] F. K. J. Rabah, M. F.Dahab: Water Research, vol. 38(2004), p.3719

Google Scholar

[15] M. Volokita, S. Belkin, A. Abeliovich and M. I. M.Soares: Water Research, vol. 30(1996), p.965

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00242-1

Google Scholar

[16] S. Israel, P. Engelbrecht, G. Tredoux and M. Fey: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 204(2009), p.177

Google Scholar

[17] O. Gibert, S. Pomierny, I. Rowe and R. M. Kalin: Bioresource Technology, vol. 99(2008), p.7587

Google Scholar

[18] D. King, D. B. Nedwell: FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 31(1985), p.23

Google Scholar