A Study of Run-to-Run Control Efficiency for Quality Improvement

Article Preview

Abstract:

In a traditional run-to-run control scheme, each run requires starting the controlling model, which results in unnecessary adjustment risks when the process is stable. This study used the statistical quality control technique to calculate the adjustment limit, and proposed the start process controller criterion to prevent over-control. The simulation analysis results of the single-input single-output process showed that when the autoregressive parameter is large, the MSE when using the self-tuning controller in addition to an appropriate adjustment limit is less than that of the EWMA controller with an integrated adjustment limit. When the autoregressive parameter is small, no significant differences of MSE are present, though the EWMA controller with an adjustment limit is advantageous due to easier calculation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

283-286

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Del Castillo, A multivariate self-tuning controller for run-to run process control under shift and trend disturbances, IIE Transactions, Vol. 28 (1996), pp.1011-1021.

DOI: 10.1080/15458830.1996.11770756

Google Scholar

[2] Ingolfsson, A. and Sacha, E., Stability and Sensitivity of an EWMA Controller, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 25, No.4, (1993), pp.271-287.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1993.11979473

Google Scholar

[3] Guo, R. S., Chen, A. and Chen, J. J., Run-to-run control schemes for CMP process subject to deterministic drifts, Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology Workshop, (2000) pp.251-258.

DOI: 10.1109/smtw.2000.883103

Google Scholar

[4] Jen, C. H., Jiang, B. C. and Fan, S. K. S., General run-to-run (R2R) control framework using self-tuning control for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) processes, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42, No. 20, (2004), pp.4249-4270.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540410001708498

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang, B. C., Wang, C. C., Lu, John., Jen, C. H., and Fan, S. K., Using Simulation Techniques to Determine Optimal Operational Region for Multi-Responses Problems, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, No. 12(2009), pp.3219-3230.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540701823227

Google Scholar

[6] Jiang, B. C., Wang, C. C, Jen, C. H and Wu, M. Y., A Run-to-Run Controller Using Fuzzy Neural Network Techniques for SISO Process, Expert System with Application, Vol. 36, (2009), pp.12044-12048.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.011

Google Scholar

[7] Jiang, B. C., Wang, C. C., Jen, C. H and Luo, L.C., Combining EWMA Control Chart to Reduce Process Control Frequency for Run-to-Run (R2R), Journal of Quality, Vol. 16, No.4, (2009), pp.233-243.

Google Scholar

[8] Jen, C. H. and Jiang, B. C., Combining On-line Experiment and Process Control Methods for Changes in a Dynamic Model, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 13, 2008, pp.3665-3682.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540601120476

Google Scholar

[9] Jen, C. H., Jiang, B. C., and Wang, C. C., Integration R2R control schemes and on-line experiment for dealing with the changes in semiconducting dynamic processes, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 49, (2011), pp.5657-5678.

DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.518999

Google Scholar

[10] Jen, C. H., Lin, K. P., Wu Wen and Chou, C. C., Using LDA with on-line experiment methods for coping with changes in MIMO Dynamic Model, Expert System with Application, Vol. 38 (2011), pp.983-989.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.101

Google Scholar

[11] Masatoshi, N. and Ken, T., Advanced Gate Etching for Accurate CD Control for 130-nm Node ASIC Manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 17, (2004), pp.281-285.

DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2004.831932

Google Scholar

[12] Patel, N. S. and Jenkins, S. T., Adaptive optimization of run-to-run controllers: the EWMA example, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 13, No.1 (2000), pp.97-107.

DOI: 10.1109/66.827349

Google Scholar