Feature-Based GDLOH Deformable Registration for CT Lung Image

Article Preview

Abstract:

To improve the efficiency and accuracy of the conventional SIFT-TPS (Scale-invariant feature transform and Thin-Plate Spline) method in deformable registration for CT lung image, we develop a novel approach by using combining SURF(Speeded up Robust Features) and GDLOH(Gradient distance-location-orientation histogram) to detect matching feature points. First, we employ SURF as feature detection to find the stable feature points of the two CT images rapidly. Then GDLOH is taken as feature descriptor to describe each detected points characteristic, in order to supply measurement tool for matching process. In our experiment, five couples of clinical images are simulated using our algorithm above, result in an obvious improvement in run-time and registration quality, compared with the conventional methods. It is demonstrated that the proposed method may create a new window in performing a good robust and adaptively for deformable registration for CT lung tomography.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

969-973

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Crum W, Hartkens T, Hill D: Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(2): 140–153.

Google Scholar

[2] Pluim J, Maintz J, Viergever M: Mutual information based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22(8): 986–1004.

DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2003.815867

Google Scholar

[3] Lu W, Chen M L, Olivera G H, et al. Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations[J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2004, 49(14): 3067.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/14/003

Google Scholar

[4] Schreibmann E, Chen G T Y, Xing L. Image interpolation in 4D CT using a BSpline deformable registration model[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2006, 64(5): 1537-1550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.018

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Xie,M. Chao, G. Xiong, Deformable Image Registration of Liver With Consideration of Lung Sliding Motion, Med. Phys, 2011, 38(10): 5351-5361.

DOI: 10.1118/1.3633902

Google Scholar

[6] Zitova B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey[J]. Image and vision computing, 2003, 21(11): 977-1000.

DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(03)00137-9

Google Scholar

[7] Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Surf: Speeded up robust features[J]. Computer Vision–ECCV 2006, 2006: 404-417.

DOI: 10.1007/11744023_32

Google Scholar

[8] Juan L, Gwun O. A comparison of sift, pca-sift and surf[J]. International Journal of Image Processing (IJIP), 2009, 3(4): 143-152.

Google Scholar

[9] Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. A performance evaluation of local descriptors[J]. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2005, 27(10): 1615-1630.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2005.188

Google Scholar

[10] Bradski G, Kaehler A. Learning OpenCV: Computer vision with the OpenCV library[M]. O'Reilly Media, Incorporated, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, et al. The ITK software guide[M]. Kitware, (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] Viola, P., Wells III, W.M.: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International Journal of Computer Vision 24 (1997) 137–154.

Google Scholar

[13] Pluim, J., Maintz, J., Viergever, M.: Mutual information based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22 (2003) 986–1004.

DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2003.815867

Google Scholar