The Research on the Ka-Band Characteristics of the Satellite-Ground Link

Article Preview

Abstract:

As the low-band is more and more crowded, moving to Ka-band for the satellite-ground measurement and communication is preferred in the literature. This paper aims to contribute to the understanding of the influence of the atmosphere on the range error and the attenuation in Ka-band. By adopting the method recommended by ITU-R, we analyze the delay range error and the attenuation induced by the ionosphere and troposphere for Ka-band. The result shows that the ionosphere delay range error is significantly reduced in Ka-band comparing with navigation band. The maximal ionosphere delay range error is about 1m in Ka-band. The troposphere delay range error in Ka-band is the same as that in navigation band. When the elevation angle is over 40º, the troposphere delay range error become flat and doesnt exceed approximately 4 m. With respect to atmospheric attenuation, two important findings are obtained: firstly, when the elevation angle is over 40º, the atmospheric attenuation doesnt change significantly and is generally below 2 dB. Secondly, the atmospheric attenuation reaches its peak at the frequency of approximately 22.5GHz in Ka-band. Finally, an important conclusion can be drawn that in the design of the Ka-band satellite-ground measurement system, it should be considered to make the system work at the elevation angle over 40º. Thus, in generally, the range error doesnt exceed 5 m and the attenuation doesnt exceed 2 dB, even though it doesnt make the model correction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1726-1732

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. LaBelle, D. Rochblatt: Ka-band high-rate telemetry system upgrade for the NASA deep space network. Acta Astronaut. Vol. 70 (2012), pp.58-68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.07.023

Google Scholar

[2] Martin Krynitz: The ground station of the future. Acta Astronaut. Vol. 67 (2010), pp.1252-1254.

Google Scholar

[3] Bassiri S, Hajj GA: Higher-order ionospheric effects on the global positioning system observables and means of modeling them. Man Ge . Vol. 18 (1993), pp.280-289.

Google Scholar

[4] A Dissanayake, J Allnutt, F Haidara: A Prediction Model that Combines Rain Attenuation and Other Propagation Impairments Along Earth-Satellite Paths. Sp. Vol. 2 (2002), pp.1-29.

DOI: 10.1109/8.633864

Google Scholar

[5] Klobuchar, J. A: Ionospheric effects on GPS. in GlobalPositioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, edited by B. W. Parkinson and J. J. Spilker, chap. 12 (1996), p.485–514.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Mainul Hoque, N. Jakowski: Higher order ionospheric propagation effects on GPS radio occultation signals. Ad Sp R. Vol. 46(2010), p.162–173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.02.013

Google Scholar

[7] Brunner FK, Gu M: An improved model for the dual frequency ionospheric correction of GPS observations. Man Ge. Vol. 16(1991), p.205–214.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang Xinlong, Li Yafeng: Study on adaptability of GPS ionospheric error correction models. Aircraft Eng. Aerospace Technol. Vol. 81 (2009), p.316–322.

DOI: 10.1108/00022660910967309

Google Scholar

[9] Y.T. Morton: Assessment of the Higher Order Ionosphere Error on Position Solutions. Navig . Vol. 56(2009), pp.185-193.

Google Scholar

[10] J.J. Spilker Jr: Tropospheric Effects on GPS. in GlobalPositioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, edited by B. W. Parkinson and J. J. Spilker, chap. 13(1996), p.517–544.

Google Scholar

[11] J.P. Collins: Assessment and Development of a Tropospheric Delay Model for Aircraft Users of the Global Positioning System. University of East London. (1993).

Google Scholar

[12] J.A. Klobuchar, J.M. Kunches: Comparative range delay and variability of the earth's troposphere and the ionosphere. GPS Solutions. Vol. 7(2003), pp.55-58.

DOI: 10.1007/s10291-003-0047-5

Google Scholar

[13] A. Tuka, A. El-Mowafy Performance evaluation of different troposphere delay models and mapping functions. Mea. Vol. 46 (2012), pp.928-937.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.015

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: /www. itu. int/rec/R-REC-P. 834/en.

Google Scholar

[15] Information on http: /www. itu. int/rec/R-REC-P. 453/en.

Google Scholar

[16] Mohamed-Slim Alouini, S.A. Borgsmiller, P.G. Steffes: Channel Characterization and Modeling for Ka-Band Very Small Aperture Terminals. Revised for the proceedings of the IEEE. (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/5.598420

Google Scholar

[17] Information on http: /www. itu. int/rec/R-REC-P. 676/en.

Google Scholar

[18] Information on http: /www. itu. int/rec/R-REC-P. 835/en.

Google Scholar