Social Security Research under Automation Control

Abstract:

The development of the modern welfare state is not isolated; their welfare policy implementation depends on the advanced economy, extensive coverage, the perfect system, the diversification and welfare system mandatory. Social network analysis is just take this dependence into account, and develop corresponding method to deal with the relationship between variables. This paper, based on the p* model analysis, takes Sweden and Finland, two typical Nordic welfare state, as the examples, and finds the differences in disease disability insurance, unemployment insurance and etc. To understand these differences is of great importance to think about whether to conduct the reform of the welfare state, and how to combine the concrete national conditions with the reform.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 340)
• Pages: 621-625
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.340.621
• Online since: July 2013
• Authors: Fang Liu
• Keywords: Automation, Control, p* Model, Social Security

References

[1] Liu Jun, Analysis and Discussion on the Model of Social Network, Sociological Research, no. 1, p.21, (2004).

[2] Lin Juren, Social Network Analysis, Beijing Normal University Press, China, (2009).

[3] Liu Jun, An Introduction to social network analysis, social sciences academic press, China, p.132, (2004).

[4] Wei Shunping, The Semantic Model of AID and Its Realizing Methods, Modern Educational Technology, no. 3, p.78, (2010).

[5] Han Chen, Research and Reference on the Welfare State of Northern European, Market Weekly, no. 1, p.48, (2005).

[6] Helka Hyttl, Why are Swedes sick but Finns unemployed, International Journal of Social Welfare no. 9, p.15, (2006).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00412.x

[7] Lena Dahlberg, Interation between Voluntary and Statutory Social Service Provision in Sweden: A Matter of Welfare Pluralism, Substitution or Complemmentarity, Social Policy & Administration vol. 39, no. 7, pp.78-81, (2005).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00467.x

[8] Lena Dahlberg phd, The complementarity norm: service provision by the welfare state and voluntary organisations in Sweden, Health and Social Care in the Community, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.302-310, (2002).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00621.x

[9] Mikael Nygard, Welfare-Ideological Change in Scandinavia: A Comparative Analysis of Partisan Welfare State Positions in Four Nordic Countries, 1970-2003 Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 29, no. 4, p.231, (2006).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00156.x