Seismic Behaviour of Precast Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Connections: A Literature Review

Article Preview

Abstract:

Precast construction is gaining importance during recent past. Most of the studies reported on precast beam-column joints are to select the appropriate connections to be adopted particularly for regions of low to moderate seismicity. This paper reports on a comprehensive review of literature on the investigations carried out to analyze and evaluate the behaviour of precast concrete structural systems assembled with typical connections or joints under simulated earthquake loading. The seismic performance of precast concrete structure very much depends on the ductility of the joints framed by precast beams and columns. It has been understood that (1) moment resistance beam-column connection and (2) ductile connectors seems to be the most widely used in the precast construction in seismic regions. Further, refinement and research could be carried out in order to optimize such connections to be recommended in low seismicity regions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-13

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Alcocer, S.M., Carranza, R., Perez-Navarrete, D. and Martinez, R. Seismic Tests of Beam-to-Column Connections in a Precast Concrete Frame, PCI Journal, Vol. 47, N0. 3, pp.70-89, (2002).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05012002.70.89

Google Scholar

[2] Megally, S., F. Seible, M. Garg and R.K. Dowell, Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge superstructures with internally bonded prestressing tendons. PCI J., 47: 2-18, (2002).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03012002.40.56

Google Scholar

[3] Ertas, O., Ozden, S. and Ozturan, T. Ductile Connections in Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames, PCI Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp.2-12, (2006).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05012006.66.76

Google Scholar

[4] G. Metelli and P. Riva., Behaviour of a beam to column dry, joint for precast Concrete elements, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.

Google Scholar

[5] Glover, C.W., Structural Precast Concrete. 1st Edn. CR Books Limited, London, pp: 664, (1964).

Google Scholar

[6] Begum, R.A., S.K. Satari and J.J. Pereira, Waste generation and recycling: Comparison of conventional and industrialized building systems. Am. J. Environ. Sci., 6: 383-388. DOI: 10. 3844/ajessp. 2010. 383. 388, (2010).

DOI: 10.3844/ajessp.2010.383.388

Google Scholar

[7] Sadrnejad, S.A. and M. Labibzadeh, Dynamic solution code for structural analysis upon joint element. J. Comput. Sci., 2: 401-409. DOI: 10. 3844/jcssp. 2006. 401. 409, (2006).

DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2006.401.409

Google Scholar

[8] Yalciner, H. and A.A. Hedayat, Repairing and strengthening of an existing reinforced concrete building: A north cyprus perspective. Am. J. Eng. Applied Sci., 3: 109-116. DOI: 10. 3844/ajeassp. 2010. 109. 116, (2010).

DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2010.109.116

Google Scholar

[9] Marcakis, K. and Mitchell, D. Precast Concrete Connections with Embedded Steel Members, PCI Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp.88-116, (1980).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.07011980.88.116

Google Scholar

[10] Suyamburaja, A. and K. Subramanian, Experimental Investigation on three dimensional RC in filled frame-RC plane frame interactions with slab for seismic resistance. Am. J. Applied Sci., 5: 328-333. DOI: 10. 3844/ajassp. 2008. 328. 333, (2008).

DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.328.333

Google Scholar

[11] Ebrahimi, M., H. Sharifian and M. Ahangar, Seismic response evaluation of moment resistant frame with built-up column section. Am. J. Eng. Applied Sci., 3: 37-41. DOI: 10. 3844/ajeassp. 2010. 37. 41, (2010).

DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2010.37.41

Google Scholar

[12] Priestley, M.J.N., S. Sritharan, J.R. Conley and S. Pampanin, Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J., 44: 42-67. (1999).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67

Google Scholar

[13] Elliot, K.S., G. Davies, H. Gorgun and M.R. Adlparvar, The stability of precast concrete skeletal structure. PCI J., 43: 42-57, (1998).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03011998.42.60

Google Scholar

[14] Ochs, J.E. and Ehsani, M.R. Moment Resistant Connections in Precast Concrete Frames for Seismic Regions, PCI Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp.64-75, (1993).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.09011993.64.75

Google Scholar

[15] Manoj, K.J., C.V.R. Murty and M.P. Jaisingh, Cyclic behaviour of precast RC connections. Indian Connection. Indian Concrete J., 50: 43-50, (2005).

Google Scholar

[16] Megget, L.M., The seismic design and performance of reinforced concrete beam-column knee joints in buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 19: 863-895. DOI: 10. 1193/1. 1623782, (2003).

DOI: 10.1193/1.1623782

Google Scholar

[17] Englekirk, R.E., An innovative design solution for precast prestressed concrete buildings in high seismic zones. PCI J., 41: 44-53, (1996).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.07011996.44.53

Google Scholar

[18] Englekirk, R.E., 2003. Seismic Design of Reinforced and Precast Concrete Buildings. 1st Edn, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, ISBN-10: 0471081221, pp: 848.

Google Scholar