Multi-Objective Optimization in Manufacturing Engineering for Slender Pen Rod Injection Molding Quality Based on Grey Correlation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper a new approach for the optimization of the multi-objective injection molding process based on the Taguchi robust design combined with the grey relational analysis has been studied. A grey relational grade obtained from the multi-objective grey relational analysis is used to solve the injection molding process with the multiple performance characteristics including volume shrinkage (R1) and axial deformation (R2), the injecting parameters, namely mold temperature, melt temperature, holding pressure and holding time are optimized. By orthogonal polar difference analysis and statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) of grey relational grade, main factors influencing and the best process parameters were determined: A=50°C,B=250°C,C=30MPa,D=9s.Under the case of continuity factor, Fitting the response surface further the optimal combination of in continuous space r is identified: A=50.3°C,B=250°C,C=29MPa,D=8.3s. Experimental results have shown that the Taguchi combined with the grey relational analysis can avoid human evaluation of the multi-objective optimization, and Injection molding multi-objective optimization is implemented more objectively, and product performance in the process can be improved effectively through this approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

486-493

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tong L I, Wang C H, Chen H C. Optimization of multiple responses using principal component analysis and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 27(3-4): 407-414.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2157-9

Google Scholar

[2] Xiaohong Tan, Haizhou Mao, Wenshen Wang, Multi-objective optimization for slender rod injection molding process parameter based on orthogonal and response surface, Modern plastics processing and application.

Google Scholar

[3] Tong L I, Wang C H, Chen C C, et al. Dynamic multiple responses by ideal solution analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 433-444.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00017-1

Google Scholar

[4] Jeyapaul R, Shahabudeen P, Krishnaiah K. Quality management research by considering multi-response problems in the Taguchi method–a review[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 26(11-12): 1331-1337.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2102-y

Google Scholar

[5] Wang C H, Tong L I. Optimization of dynamic multi-response problems using grey multiple attribute decision making[J]. Quality Engineering, 2004, 17(1): 1-9.

DOI: 10.1081/qen-200028450

Google Scholar

[6] Raissi S, Farsani R E. Statistical process optimization through multi-response surface methodology[J]. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 51(46): 267-271.

Google Scholar

[7] Lu H S, Chang C K, Hwang N C, et al. Grey relational analysis coupled with principal component analysis for optimization design of the cutting parameters in high-speed end milling[J]. Journal of materials processing technology, 2009, 209(8): 3808-3817.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.030

Google Scholar

[8] Antony J, Anand R B, Kumar M, et al. Multiple response optimization using Taguchi methodology and neuro-fuzzy based model[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2006, 17(7): 908-925.

DOI: 10.1108/17410380610688232

Google Scholar

[9] Chen W C, Fu G L, Tai P H, et al. Process parameter optimization for MIMO plastic injection molding via soft computing[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(2): 1114-1122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.020

Google Scholar

[10] Pal S, Gauri S K. Multi-Response Optimization Using Multiple Regression–Based Weighted Signal-to-Noise Ratio (MRWSN)[J]. Quality Engineering, 2010, 22(4): 336-350.

DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2010.495368

Google Scholar