Comparative Analysis of Finite Element Method and Analytical Method on the Truss

Hai Bo Liu; Yu Li Liu; Li Hua Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351-352.865

Paper Titles

Research on Bearing Capacity Calculation of Parabolic Steel Arch Structure under Full-Span and Half-Span Loading
p.845

The Comparative Analysis on Calculation Methods of Vertical Seismic Response to Suspended-Dome Structure
p.849

The Application of ABAQUS in Cast-Steel Joints Elastic-Plastic Analysis
p.854

Numerical Simulation of Bond Behavior for Adhesive Anchor in Steel-to-Concrete Connection Exposed to Fire
p.860

Comparative Analysis of Finite Element Method and Analytical Method on the Truss
p.865

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis on the Abnormal Exterior Joint of Steel Reinforced Concrete
p.869

Calculation Method of Deformation and Inner Force of a Sheet Pile Wall with Relieving Platform
p.875

Numerical Simulation of Deep Beam in Short-Leg Shear Walls Structure
p.881

Low Tension-Tension Cycle Fatigue Properties of 301 Stainless Steel Thin Sheets
p.887

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 351-352Comparative Analysis of Finite Element Method and...

Comparative Analysis of Finite Element Method and Analytical Method on the Truss

Abstract:

This paper takes a typical truss as an example, respectively to using the analytical method and the finite element method for the internal force is calculated, the calculation results show that the two error within a reasonable range, the analytical method is to many assumptions as the premise, the calculation is the main force, the main force is not fully representative of truss real stress state, and the finite element method considering the situation in a more general and general, so the results are relatively reliable

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 351-352)

Pages:

865-868

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351-352.865

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Hai Bo Liu, Yu Li Liu, Li Hua Zhang

Keywords:

Analytical Method, Axial Force, Finite Element, Truss

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] YAN Yun. Design of Structure Optimization with APDL [J]. JournaI of East China Jiaotong University, 2004, 21(4): 52~55.

Google Scholar

[2] YANG Shu-yi, ZHAO Ji-yun, LIU De-shun. Probability Design of Bridge Truss Structure Based on Ansys [J]. Joumal of Hunan University of Science&Technology, 2007, 22(4): 30~33.

Google Scholar

[3] MO Tao, ZHOU Xu-hong, LIU Yong-jian, CAI Yi-yan. Anaiysis of the Load Bearing Behavior of Staggered Truss Structure [J]. JournaI of BuiIding Structures, 2000, 21(6): 49~54.

Google Scholar

[4] WANG Hui-ming, Research on Truss StructuraI Design of Optimjzatjon Based on Finite Element AnaIvsis[J]., 2004, 21 (4): 434~437.

Google Scholar

[5] LI Zhao-zhong XU Zhong-qiu WANG Li-bin. Caiculation and analysis of axial forces influence Iine of trussed arch bridge bv ANSYS [J]. SHANXl ARCHITECTURE, 2007, 33（33）: 309~313.

Google Scholar