A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Technique Based Optimal Mix Design of Porous Concrete

Abstract:

Porous concrete is one of the innovative and promising concrete products, which is featured with a relatively high water permeability rate. Compared with conventional concrete products, due to the lack of fine aggregates in the mix design of porous concrete, the void spaces between the coarse aggregates remains unfilled and causes a large amount of porosity in the hardened concrete mass. On the other hand, the strength of porous concrete is usually lower than that of the conventional concrete products due to the lack of fine aggregates. For the purpose of achieving a relatively high strength of porous concrete while maintaining a good permeability of pavements, the mix design of porous concrete is modeled as a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) system and a Gibbs Sampling method based approach is developed to approximate the optimal mix design. The simulation results show that, by using the proposed approach, the system converges to the optimal solution quickly and the derived optimal mix design achieves the tradeoff between the compressive strength and the permeability rate.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 357-360)
• Pages: 959-962
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.357-360.959
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: Lu Jin, Zhu Ge Yan
• Keywords: Compressive Strength, Gibbs Sampling, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Optimal Mix Design, Permeability, Porous Concrete

References

[1] N. Ghafoori and S. Dutta. Development of no-fines concrete pavement applications. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121(3): 283-288, (1995).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1995)121:3(283)

[2] A. Zouaghi, T. Nakazawa, F. Imai, and N. Shinnishi. Permeability of no-fines concrete. Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, 20: 31-38, (1998).

[3] W. K. Hastings. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications. Biometrika, 57(1): 97-109, (1970).

DOI: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97

[4] N. Kantas, A. Doucet, S.S. Singh, and J.M. Maciejowski. An overview of sequential monte carlo methods for parameter estimation in general state-space models. In Proc. IFAC System Identification (SysId) Meeting, (2009).

DOI: 10.3182/20090706-3-fr-2004.00129

[5] E. Triantaphyllou and S.H. Mann. An examination of the effectiveness of multidimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox. An Examination of the Effectiveness of Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Methods: A Decision-Making Paradox, 5: 303-312, (1989).

DOI: 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90037-7

[6] N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6): 1087-1092, (1953).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1699114

[7] George Casella and Edward I. George. Explaining the Gibbs Sampler. The American Statistician, 46(3): 167-174, (1992).

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1992.10475878

[8] Chunqi Lian and Yan Zhuge. Optimum mix design of enhanced permeable concrete - an experimental investigation. Construction and Building Materials, 24: 2664-2671, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.057