Stochastic Choice Behavior on Road Traffic Networks under Information Provision

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper attempts to model stochastic choice behavior in simultaneous trip route and departure time decision-making on road traffic networks, taking into account information quality and individual differences in information interpretation among the population of travelers. Different from the traditional stochastic model, the proposed choice behavior model assumes that road users simultaneously select the trip routes and departure times that have the largest probabilities of incurring the least generalized travel costs. This model is applicable in both static and dynamic settings and can be applied to both ordinary travelers as well as operators of emergent vehicles, e.g., the fire engine. The preliminary numerical experiments show that the proposed stochastic choice model can reflect the overreaction phenomena reported in studies of traffic information provision and the impacts of the types of traffic information on the effectiveness of information provision. This model opens a potential way to analyze network equilibrium behavior taking into account individual differences in the ability of information interpretation as well as information quality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2173-2184

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.L. Adler and V.J. Blue, Toward the design of intelligent traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 6 (1998) 157.

DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(98)00012-6

Google Scholar

[2] W. Barfield and F. Mannering, Behavioral and human factors issues in advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 1 (1993) 105.

DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(93)90007-3

Google Scholar

[3] M. Ben-Akiva, A. de Palma and I. Kaysi, Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 25 (1991) 251.

DOI: 10.1016/0191-2607(91)90142-d

Google Scholar

[4] H. Dia, An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 10 (2002) 331.

DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(02)00025-6

Google Scholar

[5] H. Mahmassani and R. -C. Jou, Transferring insights into commuter behavior dynamics from laboratory experiments to field surveys. Transportation Research Part A Vol. 34 (2000) 243.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(99)00003-8

Google Scholar

[6] P. Thakuriah and A. Sen, Quality of information given by advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 4 (1996) 249.

DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(97)82900-2

Google Scholar

[7] H.K. Lo and W.Y. Szeto, A methodology for sustainable traveler information services. Transportation Research Part B Vol. 36 (2002) 113.

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(00)00040-0

Google Scholar

[8] H. Yang, Multiple equilibrium behavior and advanced traveler information systems with endogenous market penetration. Transportation Research Part B Vol. 32 (1998) 205.

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(97)00025-8

Google Scholar

[9] H. Yang, Evaluating the benefit of a combined route guidance and road pricing system in a network with recurrent congestion. Transportation Vol. 26 (1999) 299.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Yang, and Q. Meng, Modeling user adoption of advanced traveler information systems: dynamic evolution and stationary equilibrium. Transportation Research Part A Vol. 35 (2001) 895.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(00)00030-6

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Yin, and H. Yang, Simultaneous determination of the equilibrium market penetration and compliance rate of advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part A Vol. 37 (2003) 165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(02)00011-3

Google Scholar

[12] J. L. Adler, and M.G. McNally, In-laboratory experiments to investigate driver behavior under advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 2 (1994) 149.

DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(94)90006-x

Google Scholar

[13] J.L. Schofer, A. Khattak and F.S. Koppelman, Behavioral issues in the design and evaluation of advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 1 (1993) 107.

DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(93)90008-4

Google Scholar

[14] T. Lotan, Effects of familiarity on route choice behavior in the presence of information. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 5 (1997) 225.

DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(96)00028-9

Google Scholar

[15] F. Mannering, S. -G. Kim, L. Ng and W. Barfield, Travelers' preferences for in-vehicle information systems: an exploratory analysis. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 3 (1995) 339.

DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(96)00014-9

Google Scholar

[16] M. Wardman, P.W. Bonsall and J.D. Shires, Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation. Transportation Research Part C Vol. 5 (1997), 389.

DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(98)00004-7

Google Scholar

[17] Y.E. Ge and B.R. Sun, A Class of Travel Time Models Taking into Account Information Quality and Individual Interpretation Abilities. Working Paper, School of Transportation & Logistics, Dalian University of Technology (2011).

Google Scholar

[18] W.S. Vickrey, Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review Vol. 59 (1969), 251.

Google Scholar

[19] R. Arnott, A. de Palma and R. Lindsey, Departure time and route choice for the morning traffic commute. Transportation Research Part A Vol. 24 (1990) 209.

DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90018-t

Google Scholar

[20] C. Hendrickson and G. Kocur, Schedule delay and departure time decision in a deterministic model. Transportation Science Vol. 15 (1981) 62.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.15.1.62

Google Scholar

[21] B. Heydecker, Dynamic equilibrium network design. Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century, edited by M.A.P. Taylor, Elservier (2002) 349.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043926-6/50020-8

Google Scholar

[22] K.A. Small, The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. American Economic Review Vol. 72 (1982) 467.

Google Scholar

[23] D.J. Holden, Wardrop's third principle: urban traffic congestion and traffic policy. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy Vol. 23 (1989) 239.

Google Scholar

[24] T.L. Friesz, D. Bernstein, Z. Suo and R. Tobin, Dynamic network user equilibrium with state-dependent time lags. Networks and Spatial Economics Vol. 1 (2001) 319.

Google Scholar

[25] B. Ran and D. Boyce, Modeling Dynamic Transportation Networks: an Intelligent Transportation System Oriented Approach (2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1996).

Google Scholar

[26] M. Ben-Akiva and S.R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1985).

Google Scholar

[27] K. Nagel, Multi-Agent Transportation Simulation. (Draft for a book, 2003).

Google Scholar

[28] B. Raney, N. Cetin, A. Völlmy, M. Vrtic, K. Axhausen and K. Nagel, An agent-based microsimulation model of Swiss travel: first results. Networks and Spatial Economics Vol. 3 (2003) 23-41.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1022096916806

Google Scholar

[29] C.F. Daganzo, A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B Vol. 29 (1995) 261.

DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00004-w

Google Scholar

[30] M. Carey and Y.E. Ge, Convergence of a discretised travel time model. Transportation Science Vol. 39 (2005) 25.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1030.0083

Google Scholar