Effect of Modification of Aluminum Borate Whiskers with Three Methods on Flexural Properties of Dental Resin Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aimed to compare three different methods for the modification of aluminium borate whiskers and investigate the effect of aluminium borate whiskers composites on flexural properties of dental resin composites. Method A was to mix aluminium borate whiskers and silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles directly. Method B was to modify the mixture of aluminium borate whiskers and SiO2 nanoparticles with sol-gel process of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). Method C was to modify the aluminium borate whiskers with SiO2 nanoparticles which were repaired by sol-gel method of TEOS. The effects of the three methods were characterized by the TEM and SEM. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the flexural strength among three methods. Group C had a flexural strength of 149.59 ± 12.86 MPa (mean ± SD; n = 5), which is significantly higher than 95.28 ± 4.53 MPa for Group A and 123.14 ± 17.37 MPa for Group B. It is concluded that ceramic whisker reinforcement significantly improves the flexural properties of resin composites; different methods produce different effects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

687-691

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreuen J, Leloup G. Dent Mater. Vol. 23 (2007), p.51.

Google Scholar

[2] Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. Dent Mater. Vol. 19(2003), p.359.

Google Scholar

[3] Hidehiko W, Satish CK, Marcos AV, Fang Q. Dent Mater. Vol. 3(2008), p.418.

Google Scholar

[4] Adachi T, Osaki M, Araki W, Kwon SC. Acta Materialia. Vol. 56(2008), p.2101.

Google Scholar

[5] Yeoh BW, Mohamad D, Rahman IA, Sipaut CS, Ghani AM. Dent Mater. Vol. 25(e2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. J Dent Res. Vol. 79(2000), p.1844.

Google Scholar

[7] Wang R, Zhang WY, Jia AQ, Sun LH. Journal of Oral Science Research. Vol. 4(2007), p.365.

Google Scholar

[8] Han YH, Taylor A, Mantle MD, Knowles KM. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. Vol. 353(2007), p.313.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang WY, Li XX, Chen QH. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Enginerering Research. Vol. 49(2008), p.9687.

Google Scholar

[10] Mao LQ, Li QL, Dang HX, Zhang ZJ. Materials research and bulletin. Vol. 2(2005), p.201.

Google Scholar

[11] Darbandi M, Thomann R, Nann T. Chem Mater. Vol. 23(2005), p.5720.

Google Scholar

[12] Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Shortalla AC, Marquisa PM. Dent Mater. Vol. 25(2009), p.180.

Google Scholar

[13] Xia Y, Zhang FM, Xie HF, Gu N. Journal of dentistry. Vol. 36(2008), p.450.

Google Scholar

[14] Tian M, Gao Y, Liu Y, Liao YL, Hedin NE, Fong H. Dent mater. Vol. 24(2008), p.235.

Google Scholar