An Efficient Environmentally-Friendly Materials for Concrete Building Protection

Article Preview

Abstract:

The concrete building protection materials is widely in the hydraulic and bridge engineering. In the external environment, water, chloride ion, deicing salt and freeze-thaw cycle is the greatest enemy of the concrete builidng , leading to concrete corrosion damage. we found that silane materials is an efficient materials for building protection ,water absorption rate of silicone protected specimens is no more than 0.004 mm/min0.5and the chloride diffusion coefficient was clearly reduced. The silane can penetrate into a few centimeters below the surface of the concrete structure to provide long-term protection. So the silane materials is considered the most suitable for concrete protection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

901-904

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Zàrraga, D.E. Alvarez-Gasca, J. Cervantes, Solvent effect on TEOS film for-mation in the sandstone consolidation process, Silicon chemistry . Vol. 1 (2002) , p.397.

DOI: 10.1023/b:silc.0000025602.64965.e7

Google Scholar

[2] HY Moon, DG Shin, DS Choi. Evaluation of the durability of mortar and concrete applied with inorganic coating material and surface treatment system. Constr Build Mater Vol. 21(2007) , p.362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.012

Google Scholar

[3] AA Almusallam, FM Khan, SU Dulaijan, OSB Al-Amoudi. Effectiveness of surface coatings in improving concrete durability. Cement Concrete Comp Vol. 25(2003), p.381.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00087-2

Google Scholar

[4] M Ibrahim, AS Al-Gahtani, M Maslehuddin, AA Almusallam. Effectiveness of concrete surface treatment materials in reducing chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion. Constr Build Mater . Vol. 11 (1997), p.443.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(97)00023-8

Google Scholar

[5] M Castellote, C Andrade. Round-Robin test on methods for determining chloride transport parameters in concrete. Mater Struct Vol. 39(2006), p.955.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9193-x

Google Scholar

[6] P.N. Manoudis, I. Karapanagiotis, A. Tsakalof, I. Zuburtikudis, B. Kolinkeovà,C. Panayiotou, Superhydrophobic films for the protection of outdoor culturalheritage assets, Appl Phys A Vol. 97 (2009) , p.351.

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-009-5233-z

Google Scholar

[7] MHF Medeiros, P Helene. Efficacy of surface hydrophobic agents in reducing water and chloride ion penetration in concrete. Mater Struct Vol. 41(2008) , p.59.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9218-5

Google Scholar

[8] M.J. Mosquera, D.M. de los Santos and A. Montes, Producing new stone con-solidants for the conservation of monumental stone, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 852 (2005) , p. OO6. 4. 1.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-852-oo6.4

Google Scholar

[9] M Maslehuddin, SH Alidi, M Mehthel, M Shameem, M Ibrahim. Performance evaluation of repair systems under varying exposure conditions. Cement Concrete Comp Vol. 27(2005) , p.885.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.04.004

Google Scholar

[10] C Andrade, MCastellote , C Alonso, C González. Non-steady-state chloride diffusion coefficients obtained from migration and natural diffusion tests –part I: comparison between several methods of calculation. Mater Struct. Vol. 33 (2000), p.21.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02481692

Google Scholar