Investigation into Fluid Velocity Field of Wedge-Shaped Gap in Grinding

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the grinding process, grinding fluid is delivered for the purposes of chip flushing, cooling, lubrication and chemical protection of work surface. Hence, the conventional method of flood delivering coolant fluid by a nozzle in order to achieve high process performance purposivelly. However, hydrodynamic fluid pressure can be generated ahead of the grinding zone due to the wedge effect between wheel peripheral surface and part surface. In this paper, a theoretical fluid velocity field modeling is presented for flow of coolant fluid of wedge-shaped gap in flood delivery surface grinding, which is based on navier-stokes equation and continuous formulae. The numerical simulation results showed that the velocity in the x direction was dominant and the side-leakage in the y direction existed. The velocity in the z direction was smaller than the others because of the assumption of laminar flow. The smaller the gap is, the larger the velocity in the x direction. The magnitude of the velocity is also proportional to the surface velocity of the wheel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

593-598

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Hryniewicz and A.Z. Szeri: S. Journal of Tribology ASME, Vol. 123 (2001), pp.101-107.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Brinksmeier and E. Minke: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 42 (1993) No. 1, pp.367-370.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Guo and S. Malkin: Journal for Engineering for Industry ASME, Vol. 114 (1992), pp.427-434.

Google Scholar

[4] C.C. Chang: Tribology international, Vol. 30 (1997) No. 8, pp.575-581.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Zhang and A. Nakajima: Journal of Tribology, Vol. 122 (2000), pp.603-608.

Google Scholar

[6] C.H. Li, Y.L. Hou and S.C. Xiu: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 375-376 (2008), pp.449-453.

Google Scholar

[7] M.R. Schumack, J.B. Chung and W.W. Schultz: Transaction of the ASME, Vol. 113 (1991) No. 5, pp.190-197.

Google Scholar

[8] V.K. Gviniashvili, N.H. Woolley and W.B. Rowe: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 44 (2004), pp.629-636.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.005

Google Scholar