Influence of Machined Workpiece Surface Integrity on Fatigue Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of machined workpiece surface topography and surface integrity were studied. Modifications of surface layers after mechanical surface treatments were also reviewed. Conflict ideas exist in publications about which parameters can better define fatigue endurance. The traditional one was Arithmetic Average Roughness, although deepest surface feature and the square root of the defect area were proposed. The combinations of these factors including high temperature, metallurgical alternations and plastic deformations, rather than the residual stress alone affect surface topography and surface integrity. They should be examined carefully in order to gain a better understanding of fatigue.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1999-2003

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. R. Bayoumi, A. K. Abdellatif, Effect of surface finish on fatigue strength, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 51 (1995), 861-870.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00297-u

Google Scholar

[2] D. Arola, C. L. Williams, Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces, International Journal of Fatigue 24 (2002), 923-930.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00012-9

Google Scholar

[3] R. B. Heywood, Designing Against Fatigue, Chapman and Hall LTD, London (1962), 296-316.

Google Scholar

[4] C. E. Phillips, R. B. Heywood, Size effect in fatigue of plain and notched steel specimens, WEP 65 (1951), 113-124.

Google Scholar

[5] X-S Wang, X Lu, D-H Wang, Investigation of surface fatigue microcrack growth behavior of cast Mg-Al alloy, Materials Science and Engineering A364 (2004), 11-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.04.001

Google Scholar

[6] A. L. Mantle, D. K. Aspinwall, Surface integrity and fatigue life of turned gamma titainium aluminide, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 72 (1997), 413-420.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(97)00204-5

Google Scholar

[7] E. Eriksen, The influence of surface roughness on the mechanical strength properties of machined short-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics, Composites Science and Technology 60 (2000), 107-113.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00102-5

Google Scholar

[8] Z. F. Yue, Surface roughness evolution under constant amplitude fatigue loading using crystal plasticity, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 72 (2005), 749-757.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.06.001

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Murakami, M. Endo, Effects of defects, inclusion and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength, International Journal of Fatigue 16 (1994), 163-182.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9

Google Scholar

[10] Metcut research associates, machining data handbook, 3rd edition. Originally published by the machinability data centre, Metcut research associates Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio (1980).

DOI: 10.21236/ada038441

Google Scholar

[11] A. R. C. Sharman, D. K. Aspinwall, R. C. Dewes, D. Clifton, P. Bowen, The effects of machined workpiece surface integrity on the fatigue life of γ-titanium aluminide, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 41 (2001), 1681-1685.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00034-7

Google Scholar

[12] M. Field, W. P. Koster, J. B. Kohls, R. E. Snider, J. J. Maranchik, Machining of High Strength Steels with Emphasis on Surface Integrity, air force machinability data centre, report no. AFMDC 70-1, Metcut research associates Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio (1970).

Google Scholar

[13] M. J. Balart, A. Bouzina, L. Edwards, M. E. Fitzpatrick, The onset of tensile stresses in grinding of hardened steels, Material Science and Engineering A367 (2004), 132-142.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.239

Google Scholar

[14] W. P. Koster, M. Field, L. J. Fritz, L. R. Gatto, J. F. Kahles, Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components, air force materials laboratory technical report AFML-TR-70-11, MMP project no. 721-8, Metcut Research Associates Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio, (1970).

Google Scholar

[15] M. A. S. Torres, H. J. C. Voorwald, An evaluation of shot peening, residual stress and stress relaxation on the fatigue life of AISI 4340 steel, International Journal of Fatigue 24 (2002), 877-886.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00205-5

Google Scholar

[16] R. K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G. Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, R. O. Ritchie, On the influence of mechanical surface treatments – deep rolling and laser shock peening – on the fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V at ambient and elevated temperatures, Materials Science and Engineering A355 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00069-8

Google Scholar