Ring Test for the Measurement of Restrained Shrinkage of Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

Shrinkage of repair material is the major factor inducing cracking in concrete repairs. Induced cracks in repair materials are due to restrained shrinkage. The ring test is commonly used to assess the potential for restrained shrinkage induced cracking due to its simplicity and versatility. The restrained ring test is becoming widely used as a standard test method to assess the potential for early-age cracking in concrete. In this investigation, a ring test set up was developed to measure the restrained shrinkage of various repair materials available in the local market. Keeping in view the importance of the local environment, two environment conditions were used; Lab Environment (Temperature 23±2°C) and the open environment of Riyadh. These environmental conditions were used taking into account the local environmental conditions. The samples were outside for almost one year and encountered all weather conditions of Riyadh. It has been observed that some materials although manufactured by highly reputed companies didnt comply fully in restrained shrinkage tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

86-91

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Coutinho: The influence of the type of cement on its cracking tendency, RILEM Bulletin Vol. 5 (1995), pp.26-40.

Google Scholar

[2] M.H. Dector and R.W. Lambe: New materials for concrete repair - Development and testing. The Indian Concrete Journal (1993), pp.475-480.

Google Scholar

[3] Department of Transport: Specification for the repair of concrete highway structures. Draft standard BD /94, UK (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] P.H. Emmons and A.M. Vaysburd: The total system concept – Necessary for improving the performance of repaired structures. Concrete International Vol. 17 (3) (1995), pp.31-36.

Google Scholar

[5] C.D. Johnston and E.H. Sidwell: Testing concrete in tension and compression. Magazine of Concrete Research Vol. 20 (65) (1968), pp.221-228.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1968.20.65.221

Google Scholar

[6] M. Maultzch: Properties of PCC for repair of concrete structures. In Proceedings of 5th International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, Brighton, UK, 22-24, 301-304 (1987).

Google Scholar

[7] A.M.R. Momayez, R. A Ehsani and A. Ramezanianpour: Cylindrical specimen for measuring shrinkage in repaired concrete members. Construction and Building Materials Vol. 19 (2005), pp.107-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.007

Google Scholar

[8] R.W. Poston, K. Kesner, J.E. McDonald, A.M. Vaysburd and P.H. Emmons: Concret repair material performance – laborratory study. ACI Material Journal Vol. 98(2) (2001), pp.137-145.

Google Scholar

[9] RILEM: Direst tensile tests of concrete. RILEM Bulletin Vol. 20 (1963), pp.84-90.

Google Scholar

[10] S.P. Shah, and N. Balaguru: Plastic and Shrinkage. In Fiber reinforced cement composites. New York: Mc-Graw Hill (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] W.G. Smoak: Guide to concrete repair. USBR report, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado, USA (2002).

Google Scholar

[12] A.M. Vaysburd, G.M. Sabnis, P.H. Emmons and J.E. McDonald: Interfacial bond and surface preparation in concrete repair. The Indian Concrete Journal (2001), pp.27-33.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.S. Yuan and M. Marosszeky: Major factors affecting the performance of structural repair. In Proceedings of the ACI International Conference on Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures and Innovations in Design, Hong Kong, ACI-SP128, Vol. 2 (1991).

Google Scholar