Analysis on Children Custody Decision Making Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Children custody disputes are complicated for many judges owing to so many dynamic factors should to be considered. This paper proposes a novel model for legal expert system Based on LVQ Neural Network. Firstly, all clauses and discretionary factors, extracted from theories and judicial practice, involved with custody disputes in divorce were quantified to obtain related set elements. Then the LVQ neural network was applied to construct a model for children custody disputes weight vector analysis on the set elements. Ultimately, the weight vector close to decision boundaries between classes could promote the classification performance. Accordingly, the performance of the LVQ by generating weight vectors close to decision boundaries is higher. By testing, custody disputes legal expert system could consider all relevant circumstances from a good all-around point of view and effectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1247-1255

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. J. A. Beck, M. E. Walsh, M. B. Mechanic, C. S. Taylor. Mediator Assessment, Documentation, and Disposition of Child Custody Cases Involving Intimate Partner Abuse: A Naturalistic Evaluation of One County's Practices, Law Hum Behav (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s10979-009-9181-0

Google Scholar

[2] E. E. Wynne, JD. Children's Rights and the Biological Bias in Biological Parent Versus Third-Party Custody Disputes. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, Vol27(3), pp.179-191. Spring (1997).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02353697

Google Scholar

[3] E. Willemsen, R. Andrews, B. Karlin, and M. Willemsen. The Ethics of the Child Custody Process: Are the American Law Institute's Guidelines the Answer? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, Vol. 22(2), April 2005, pp.183-211.

DOI: 10.1007/s10560-005-3417-8

Google Scholar

[4] M. Cancian and D. Meyer. Who gets custody? Demography, 1998. vol35(2): 147-157.

DOI: 10.2307/3004048

Google Scholar

[5] J. B. Rohrbaug. A Comprehensive Guide to Child Custody Evaluations: Mental Health and Legal Perspectives. Spring, 2008, pp.43-56.

Google Scholar

[6] V. Elizabeth, N. Gavey, J. Tolmie. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Resident Mothers and the Moral Dilemmas they Face During. Fem Leg Stud (2010) 18: 253–274.

DOI: 10.1007/s10691-010-9159-9

Google Scholar

[7] S. B. Kamerman. Child, Family, and State: The Relationship Between Family Policy and Social Protection Policy. Children's Well-Being: Indicators and Research, (2010) 18: 429–437.

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2_23

Google Scholar

[8] Seongwon Cho and Jaemin Kim, Iris Recognition Using LVQ Neural Network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(LNCS) 3972, pp.26-33, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/11760023_5

Google Scholar

[9] Jing-Xin Wang, Zhi-Ying Wang, and Kui-Dai. Intrusion Alert Analysis Based on PCA and the LVQ Neural Network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(LNCS) 4234, pp.217-224, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/11893295_25

Google Scholar

[10] M. K. Bashar, N. Ohnishi, T. Matsumoto, Y. Takeuchi, H. Kudo, K. Agusa. Image retrieval by pattern categorization using wavelet domain perceptual features with LVQ neural network. Pattern Recognition Letters 26 (2005) 2315–2335.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.04.009

Google Scholar

[11] Marital Law of PRC on http: /www. npc. gov. cn.

Google Scholar

[12] Interpretation on child custody disputes of the Supreme People's Court of PRC on http: /www. court. gov. cn.

Google Scholar

[13] F. Burton: Family Law. (Cavendish Publishing Limited, Great Britan 2003).

Google Scholar

[14] R.E. Oliphant, N.V. Steegh: Work of the Family Lawyer. (Aspen Publishers, New York, 2004).

Google Scholar

[15] L.J. Harris; L.E. Teitelbaum; J. Carbone: Family Law. ( Aspen Publishers, New York, 2005).

Google Scholar

[16] Alison Diduck: Law's Family. (LexisNexis UK, 2003).

Google Scholar

[17] Oskamp and Lauritsen: AI in law and practice? So far, not much, Artificial intelligence and law. Vol. 10(2002), pp.227-236.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1025402013007

Google Scholar

[18] C. Stevens, V. Barot, and J. Carter: The Next Generation of Legal Expert Systems-New Dawn or False Dawn?, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII, Springer-Verlag London (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-130-1_33

Google Scholar