[1]
C. J. A. Beck, M. E. Walsh, M. B. Mechanic, C. S. Taylor. Mediator Assessment, Documentation, and Disposition of Child Custody Cases Involving Intimate Partner Abuse: A Naturalistic Evaluation of One County's Practices, Law Hum Behav (2010).
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-009-9181-0
Google Scholar
[2]
E. E. Wynne, JD. Children's Rights and the Biological Bias in Biological Parent Versus Third-Party Custody Disputes. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, Vol27(3), pp.179-191. Spring (1997).
DOI: 10.1007/bf02353697
Google Scholar
[3]
E. Willemsen, R. Andrews, B. Karlin, and M. Willemsen. The Ethics of the Child Custody Process: Are the American Law Institute's Guidelines the Answer? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, Vol. 22(2), April 2005, pp.183-211.
DOI: 10.1007/s10560-005-3417-8
Google Scholar
[4]
M. Cancian and D. Meyer. Who gets custody? Demography, 1998. vol35(2): 147-157.
DOI: 10.2307/3004048
Google Scholar
[5]
J. B. Rohrbaug. A Comprehensive Guide to Child Custody Evaluations: Mental Health and Legal Perspectives. Spring, 2008, pp.43-56.
Google Scholar
[6]
V. Elizabeth, N. Gavey, J. Tolmie. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Resident Mothers and the Moral Dilemmas they Face During. Fem Leg Stud (2010) 18: 253–274.
DOI: 10.1007/s10691-010-9159-9
Google Scholar
[7]
S. B. Kamerman. Child, Family, and State: The Relationship Between Family Policy and Social Protection Policy. Children's Well-Being: Indicators and Research, (2010) 18: 429–437.
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2_23
Google Scholar
[8]
Seongwon Cho and Jaemin Kim, Iris Recognition Using LVQ Neural Network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(LNCS) 3972, pp.26-33, (2006).
DOI: 10.1007/11760023_5
Google Scholar
[9]
Jing-Xin Wang, Zhi-Ying Wang, and Kui-Dai. Intrusion Alert Analysis Based on PCA and the LVQ Neural Network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(LNCS) 4234, pp.217-224, (2006).
DOI: 10.1007/11893295_25
Google Scholar
[10]
M. K. Bashar, N. Ohnishi, T. Matsumoto, Y. Takeuchi, H. Kudo, K. Agusa. Image retrieval by pattern categorization using wavelet domain perceptual features with LVQ neural network. Pattern Recognition Letters 26 (2005) 2315–2335.
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.04.009
Google Scholar
[11]
Marital Law of PRC on http: /www. npc. gov. cn.
Google Scholar
[12]
Interpretation on child custody disputes of the Supreme People's Court of PRC on http: /www. court. gov. cn.
Google Scholar
[13]
F. Burton: Family Law. (Cavendish Publishing Limited, Great Britan 2003).
Google Scholar
[14]
R.E. Oliphant, N.V. Steegh: Work of the Family Lawyer. (Aspen Publishers, New York, 2004).
Google Scholar
[15]
L.J. Harris; L.E. Teitelbaum; J. Carbone: Family Law. ( Aspen Publishers, New York, 2005).
Google Scholar
[16]
Alison Diduck: Law's Family. (LexisNexis UK, 2003).
Google Scholar
[17]
Oskamp and Lauritsen: AI in law and practice? So far, not much, Artificial intelligence and law. Vol. 10(2002), pp.227-236.
DOI: 10.1023/a:1025402013007
Google Scholar
[18]
C. Stevens, V. Barot, and J. Carter: The Next Generation of Legal Expert Systems-New Dawn or False Dawn?, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII, Springer-Verlag London (2011).
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-130-1_33
Google Scholar