Research on Continuous Reconnaissance Capability of UAV Formation in Multi-Target Situation

Article Preview

Abstract:

The efficiency of continuous reconnaissance of UAV formation will be changed with the number of UAVs, the detectability of UAV and target strength. The crossing line method is used to evaluate the efficiency of continuous reconnaissance of UAV formation. In this paper, the reconnaissance system of UAV formation in multi-target situation is analyzed using the method of Agent Based Modeling and Simulation (ABMS); and then the influence of the number of UAV, the detectability of UAV and target strength on reconnaissance effectiveness is also analyzed. Simulation results show that the number of UAVs and the detectability of UAV have a significant influence on the capability of continuous reconnaissance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

246-249

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Office of the Secretary of Defense of United States. Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032 [M]. Washington, USA: DoD of United States, (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] L. Blackmore, M. Ono, B.C. Williams, Chance-constrained optimal path planning with obstacles, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 27 (6) (2011) 1080–1094.

DOI: 10.1109/tro.2011.2161160

Google Scholar

[3] Richards A and How J P. Decentralized model predictive control of cooperating UAVs. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Bahamas, 2004: 4286-4291.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2004.1429425

Google Scholar

[4] Alighanbari, M. Task Assignment Algorithms for Teams of UAVs in Dynamic Environments, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M. S. Thesis, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] Bertuccelli, L. F. and J. P. How. Robust UAV Search for Environments with Imprecise Probability Maps, to appear at the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2005.1583068

Google Scholar

[6] Yang, Y., A. Minai, and M. Polycarpou. Evidential Map-Building Approaches for Multi-UAV Cooperative Search, American Control Conference, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2005.1469918

Google Scholar

[7] Bertuccelli, L. F. and J. P. How. Robust UAV Search for Environments with Imprecise Probability Maps, to appear at the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2005.1583068

Google Scholar

[8] Scheidt, D., Stipes, J., and Neighoff, T. Cooperating unmanned vehicles. Presented at IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Tuscon, AZ, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/icnsc.2005.1461210

Google Scholar

[9] Chandler, P., and Pachter, M., 2001, Hierarchical Control for Autonomous Teams, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, p.632–642.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-4149

Google Scholar