Tickets Sales Policy for Two-Stage Fares Airline Considering Unidirectional Substitution of Cabin and Swapping Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tickets sales policy of two routes for two-stage fares airline are studied under the following three conditions in this paper: neither unidirectional substitution of cabin nor swapping applications is considered, only unidirectional substitution of cabin is considered, both unidirectional substitution of cabin and swapping applications are considered. We formulate the corresponding decision model and derive the optimal tickets amount and expected revenue. It shows that compared with the condition that neither unidirectional substitution of cabin nor swapping applications is considered, when only unidirectional substitution of cabin is considered, the expected optimal tickets amount and expected revenue increase; compared with the condition that only unidirectional substitution of cabin is considered, when both unidirectional substitution of cabin and swapping applications are considered, the expected optimal tickets amount and expected revenue increase.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4541-4546

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lawrence W. Robinson, Optimal and approximate control policies for airline booking with sequential nonmonotonic fare classes, J. Operations Research. 43(2) (1995)252-263.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.43.2.252

Google Scholar

[2] Talluri K., van Ryzin G, Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior, J. Management Science. 50(2004)15-33.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0147

Google Scholar

[3] Lohatepanont M., C. Barnhart, Airline schedule planning: integrated models and algorithms for schedule design and fleet assignment, J. Transportation Science. 38(1) (2004)19-32.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1030.0026

Google Scholar

[4] Kunnumkal S., TalluriK A, Randomized linear programming method for network revenue management with product-specific no-Shows, J. Transportation Science. 46(1) (2012)90-108.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1110.0386

Google Scholar

[5] Liang Y, Solution to the continuous time dynamic yield management model, J. Transportation Science. 33(1999)117-123.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.33.1.117

Google Scholar

[6] Zhao W., Zheng Y. S, A dynamic model for airline seat allocation with passenger diversion and no-show, J. Transportation Science. 35(2001)80-98.

DOI: 10.1287/trsc.35.1.80.10145

Google Scholar

[7] Levin Y., McGill J. I., Nediak M, Dynamic pricing in the presence of strategic consumers and oligopolistic competition, J. Management Science. 55(1) (2009)32-46.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0936

Google Scholar

[8] Chen S., Gallego G., Michael Z.F. Li, Lin B, Optimal seat allocation for two-flight problems with a flexible demand segment, J. European Journal of Operational Research. 201(3) (2010)897-908.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.009

Google Scholar