An Integrated Production System Model and Project Plan Restricted Pull-Way Production Control Method for Lean Shipbuilding

Article Preview

Abstract:

Shipyards are facing challenges when trying to manage their project plan under make to order mode and, at the same time, control their production process in a pull way according to the lean manufacturing principle. A Lean shipbuilding planning and pull-way control integrated system (LSPCIS) model is established, which provides the architecture of realizing the lean principle in planning and production control area for shipbuilding. Then, a Project Plan Restricted Pull-way production control method (PPRP) is introduced where the bottom level is based on pull principle, while under the restriction of receding horizon plan and project plan. The study reveals that even under the make to order production mode of shipbuilding, it is still possible to establish a leanness oriented planning and production Control system, where the receding horizon plan can work as a middle level between the project plan and pull-way production control. The result of a production process simulation is introduced at the end of the paper, to validate the advantage of the PPRP control method comparing with the normal KANBAN control and pure push way of material delivery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1852-1859

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Luo Zhenbi, Me Ruhu, Luo Jie, et. Lean Production and Management (Part three): The Progression of world manufacturing, World Manufacturing Engineering & Market, vol 5(2007), pp.90-97.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Minghua, Huang Sheng, Lean Shipbuilding-Study of Japanese Shipbuilding System, Ship Engineering, Vol 27(2005), pp.62-66.

Google Scholar

[3] Jeffrey K. Liker, The Toyota Way, Beijing, China Financial & Economic Publishing House(2004).

Google Scholar

[4] Lan Boxiong, Jiang Nan, Dynamic Enterprise Resource Optimization Model Based on Rolling Planning, Operations Research and Management Science, vol 19(2010), pp.136-143.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Pierucci, G. Buzzi Ferraris, Rolling-Horizon Algorithm for Scheduling under Time-Dependent Utility Pricing and Availability, Pedro M. Castro, Iiro Harjunkoski, Ignacio E. Grossmannc, 20th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, vol 28(2008).

DOI: 10.1016/s1570-7946(10)28196-8

Google Scholar

[6] Shao Hao, Chen Hunping, Sun Guangzhong, et., Efficient rolling horizon algorithms for resources-constrained scheduling problems with buffers, Systems Engineering~Theory&Practice, vol 30(2010), pp.119-125.

Google Scholar

[7] Pan Quanke, Zhu Jianying, Rolling time horizon Job Shop Scheduling Strategy in Dynamic Environment, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol 37(2005), pp.262-268.

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Yi, Gao Qi, Job Selection Method of Job Rolling Scheduling Based on Rough-Neural Network, Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Manufacturing Technique, ( 2010) pp.104-107.

Google Scholar

[9] Spearman, M.L., Woodruff, D.L., Hopp, W.J., CONWIP: A pull alternative to Kanban, International Journal of Production Research, vol 23(1996), p.879–894.

DOI: 10.1080/00207549008942761

Google Scholar

[10] Richard P. Marek, Debra A. Elkins Donald R. Smith, Understanding the Fundamentals of Kanban and CONWIP Pull Systems Using Simulation, Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference(2001), pp.921-929.

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2001.977394

Google Scholar

[11] Spearman M. and Zazanis,M., Push and pull production systems: Issues and comparisons, Operations Research, vol 40(1992), p.521–532.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.40.3.521

Google Scholar

[12] Lee L C. A, comparative study of the push and pull productions systems, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol 9(1989), pp.5-18.

Google Scholar

[13] Jose M. Framinan, Pedro L. Gonza' Lez, Rafael Ruiz-Usano, The CONWIP production control system: review and research issues, Production Planning & Control, vol 4(2003), p.255–265.

DOI: 10.1080/0953728031000102595

Google Scholar

[14] Spearman, M., Customer service in pull production systems, Operations Research, vol 40(1992), p.948–958.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.40.5.948

Google Scholar

[15] Bonvik, A. M., Couch, C. E., and Gershwin, S. B., A comparison of production-line control mechanisms, International Journal of Production Research, vol 35(1997), pp.789-804.

DOI: 10.1080/002075497195713

Google Scholar

[16] Kumar Satyam and Ananth Krishnamurthy, Performance evaluation of a multi- product system under CONWIP control, IIE Transactions, vol 40(2008), p.252–264.

DOI: 10.1080/07408170701488086

Google Scholar

[17] Luo Ming, Gu Hanyu, CONWIP Release Method in Multi-reentrant Production Lines, Computer Simulation, vol 23(2006), pp.232-235.

Google Scholar

[18] Brüggemann, Wolfgang Jahnke, Hermann, The discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem: Complexity and modification for batch availability, European Journal of Operational Research, vol 124(2000), p.511–528.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00190-3

Google Scholar

[19] Bonvik, A. M., and Gerhwin, S. B., Beyond Kanban: Creating and analyzing lean shop floor control policies, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Conference Proceedings, Dartmouth College, The Amos Tuck School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755(1996).

Google Scholar

[20] Framinan, J. M., Ruiz-Usano, R., Leisten, R., Input control and dispatching rules in a dynamic CONWIP flow-shop, International Journal of Production Research, vol 38(2000), p.4589–4598.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540050205523

Google Scholar