Controlling CO2 and CH4 Emission in a Degraded Peat Swamp Forest Related to Water Table and Peat Characteristics

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study focuses on factors controlling CO2 and CH 4 emission in a peat swamp forest related to water table and peat characteristics such as peat depth, C-organic, pH, ash content and N-total. This study was conducted in the dry season at a Merang peat swamp forest that has degraded due to logging activities, forest fires and canal opening. Emission of CO2 and CH4 was measured by using a closed chamber made by PVC material (60 cm x 60 cm x 40 cm). This close chamber was completed with a fan inside the chamber to stir the gas, a thermometer inside the chamber to measure the gas temperature and a syringe to sample gas. This study has shown that the highest CO2 emission is at an average of 438.93 mg/m2/hr occurring in land cover type (1) ferns and grasses (open burned area) and the lowest is at average of 44.45 mg/m2/hr in the gelam and belidang-dominated land. The emission of CH4 is very low between 0.0018 to 0.0069 mg/m2/hr. the main controlling factor on CO2 and CH4 emission is concluded to be the water table. The emission of CO2 will be greater if water table, pH and C-organic increase.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

202-206

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Limpens, J et al. Peatlands and Carbon Cycle: From Local Process to Global Implications. Biogeosciences, 5, Hal 1475-1491. (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Mubekti. Pola Penurunan Tanah di Lahan Gambut pada Berbagai Karakteristik Tanahgambut (Konsolidasi, Kompaksi, Dekomposisi ) dan pengaruhnya terhadap emisi karbon. Technical Note. BPPT. (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] Hooijer, A., M Silvius, H Wösten, S Page. Peat-CO2 Assessment of CO2 emissions from Drained Peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943. (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] Tajudin, EK. Program dan Skema Penurunan Laju Deforestrasi dan Degradasi Hutan Rawa Gambut di Sumatera- Selatan . Workshop ITTO Project RED. Palemban. (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] Michael L. Welloc., Brian Redidy., Cristina. Soil Organic Carbon Stoc. Forestry Journal. (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Kim. H Tan. Soil physic. (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] Page, et. al. Review of Peat Surface Green House Gas emission from Oil Palm Plantations in Southeast Asia. ICCT. (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Hillel, D. Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. Elsevier Academic Press. (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] Reddy Ramesh, Biogeochemistry of Wetland, CRC Press. (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] Martikainen. Flux carbon. (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] Szaljak, L et al. Chemical Properties of Different Peat Moorsh Soils From The Biebrza River Valley, Agronomy Research 5(2), 165-174. (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] Murayama, S., Z. A, Bakar. Decomposition Of Tropical Peat Soils, Estimation of in Situ Decomposition by Measurement of CO2 Flux. JARQ 30, 153-158. (1996).

Google Scholar

[13] Hooijer, A., M Silvius, H Wösten, S Page,. Peat-CO2 Assessment of CO2 emissions from Drained Peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943. (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] Huistedent ,V. J., Van Den Bos, R., Alvares M. Modeling the Effect of water Table management on CO2 and CH4 fluxes from peat soils. Netherland Journal of Geosciences : 3-18. (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] Vien, D.M. et al. Carbon Dioksida Emission From Peatland in Relation to Hydrology, Peat moisture, humification at the Vo Doi National Park Vietnam. World Congress of Soil Science. Brisbane. Australia. (2010).

Google Scholar

[16] Barkah, S.B. Survey Vegetasi dan Kerusakan Hutan Rawa Gambut Areal MRPP. Laporan Kegiatan Survey. MRPP-GIZ. (2009).

Google Scholar

[17] Solichin. Laporan Merang REDD Pilot Project. (2010).

Google Scholar

[18] Hucinson and Livingstone. Gas Flux Measurement. (2002).

Google Scholar

[19] Pumpanen, J et al. Comparison of Different Chamber Technique For Measuring Soil CO2 Efflux, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology : page 159-176. (2004).

Google Scholar

[20] Widen, B., Lindroth, A. Callibration System For Soil Carbon Dioksida Measurement Chamber: Description and Application, Soil Science Soc, 67, 327-334. (2003).

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2003.3270

Google Scholar

[21] Agus, F., et al., 2010. Root Respiration Interferes with Peat CO2 Emission Measurement. Word Congress of Soil Science. Brisbane, Australia.

Google Scholar

[22] Madset, R. Consideration for Making Chamber –based Soil CO2 Flux Measurement, World Congress Soil Science, Australia. (2010).

Google Scholar

[23] Page, et. al. Review of Peat Surface Green House Gas emission from Oil PalmPlantations in Southeast Asia. ICCT. (2011).

Google Scholar

[24] Saad, N,S. Pengukuran Emisi CO2 . Balai Penelitian Lingkungan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian. (2007).

Google Scholar