Distributed Control in Waterflow-Like Locomotion for UBot Modular Robot over Uneven Terrain

Abstract:

Distributed control, represented by Cellular Automata (CA), has advantage over centralized control for Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot (MSRR) in capability of extension, efficiency and robustness. But due to the fact that the modular constraints, e.g., the number of DOF and the physical geometry, etc., the ideal CA rules cannot be implemented on the real robot system easily. The goal of the research is on design and implementation of distributed control based on integrated module design and CA rules arrangement. 2-DOF cubic-shaped modular model is first proposed, that is the Ubot module. Cellular rules are arranged according to the locomotion property of UBot module, and distributed control algorithm is designed for the robot to cross the uneven terrain. In simulation and on physical robotic hardware platform, experiments are carried out for UBot to verify the validity of CA theory applied on reconfiguration locomotion of UBot MSRR systems in complex environment.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 391)
• Pages: 457-460
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.391.457
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Yan He Zhu, Dong Yang Bie, Xiao Lu Wang, Jing Chun Yin, Jie Zhao
• Keywords: Cellular Automata (CA), Distributed Control, Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot (MSRR), Reconfiguration Locomotion

References

[1] Z. Butler, D. Rus, Distributed planning and control for modular robots with unit-compressible modules, The International Journal of Robotics Research 22 (2003) pp.699-715.

DOI: 10.1177/02783649030229002

[2] H. Kurokawa, K. Tomita, A. Kamimura, et al., Distributed self-reconfiguration of M-TRAN III modular robotic system, The International Journal of Robotics Research 27 (2008) pp.373-386.

DOI: 10.1177/0278364907085560

[3] D. Brandt, D.J. Christensen, A new meta-module for controlling large sheets of ATRON modules, (2007), pp.2375-2380.

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2007.4399191

[4] A. Sproewitz, P. Laprade, S. Bonardi, et al., Roombots—Towards decentralized reconfiguration with self-reconfiguring modular robotic metamodules, (2010), pp.1126-1132.

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5649504

[5] K.C. Prevas, C. Unsal, M.O. Efe, et al., A hierarchical motion planning strategy for a uniform self-reconfigurable modular robotic system, (2002), pp.787-792 vol. 1.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2002.1013454

[6] H. Wei, D. Li, J. Tan, et al., The distributed control and experiments of directional self-assembly for modular swarm robots, IEEE, (2010), pp.4169-4174.

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5650244

[7] K. Støy, Emergent control of self-reconfigurable robots, Citeseer, (2003).

[8] Z. Butler, Generic Decentralized Control for Lattice-Based Self-Reconfigurable Robots, The International Journal of Robotics Research 23 (2004), pp.919-937.

DOI: 10.1177/0278364904044409

[9] J. Zhao, X. Cui, Y. Zhu, et al., UBot: a new reconfigurable modular robotic system with multimode locomotion ability, Industrial Robot: An International Journal 39 (2012), pp.178-190.

DOI: 10.1108/01439911211201645