Extended Parametric Modeling of Transition Tube with Constant Section Area along Arbitrary Central Routes on CATIA

Article Preview

Abstract:

Extended parametric models of transition tube structures were implemented based on authors previous work [11] on constant cross section area assumption along arbitrary central routes like straight, circular and oblique curves on CATIA platform. It is aimed at that these structures can provide more flexible geometric configuration options and modifications to tube channel transitions for multi phase flow systems and pipeline junctions. Details of parameterized modeling process were exhibited on CATIA Generative Shape Design module with the help of Parameters and Relations functions. The tube surface models are all in circular cross sections and constrained in many ways along arbitrary coplanar or cylindrical sub-central routes three dimensionally for various layouts. Future work is emphasized on numerical simulation and experimental investigation with these geometric structures in multi phase flow systems and pipeline application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

197-200

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. -B. Li et al.: Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. Vol. 39 (2012), pp.1-16.

Google Scholar

[2] C. -X. Zhao, Middelberg and Anton P.J.: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 66 (2011), pp.1394-1411.

Google Scholar

[3] Vimal Kumar, Marius Paraschivoiu and K.D.P. Nigam: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 66 (2011), pp.1329-1373.

Google Scholar

[4] Wonjin Jeon and Chee Burm Shin: Chem. Eng. J. Vol. 152 (2009), pp.575-582.

Google Scholar

[5] Volker Hessel, Holger Löwe and Friedhelm Schönfeld: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 60 (2005), pp.2479-2501.

Google Scholar

[6] David C. Walther and Jeongmin Ahn: Progress in Energy and Combustion Sci. Vol. 37 (2011), pp.583-610.

Google Scholar

[7] Elmabruk A. Mansur et al.: Chinese J. of Chem. Eng. Vol. 16(4) (2008), pp.503-516.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Walker et al.: Nuclear Engineering and Design. Vol. 239 (2009), pp.116-126.

Google Scholar

[9] J.J. Jeong et al.: Inter J. of Heat and Fluid Flow. Vol. 29 (2008), pp.178-193.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Vicente et al.: Applied Mathematical Modelling. Vol. 33 (2009), pp.1248-1258.

Google Scholar

[11] X. -B, Meng, L., Wang and Z. -J. Pan: Advanced Materials Research. Vol. 619 (2013), pp.18-21.

Google Scholar

[12] J.S. Jayakumar et al.: Chemical Engineering Research and Design. Vol. 86 (2008), pp.221-232.

Google Scholar

[13] Z. Zhao et al.: International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. Vol. 38 (2011), pp.1189-1194.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Mahon and C. Meskell: Journal of Fluids and Structures. Vol. 25 (2009), pp.1348-1368.

Google Scholar

[15] F. Zhao, M. -C. Lai and D.L. Harrington: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. Vol. 25 (1999), pp.437-562.

Google Scholar