Experimental Study on a Piezoelectric Energy Generator Excited by Rotating Magnets

Article Preview

Abstract:

To meet the demand of rotating mechanism for self-powered monitoring system, piezoelectric energy generator (PEG) excited by the magnetic coupling force between rotating magnets fixed on a rotator and those fixed on piezo-beam was presented. The influence of magnetic force (number and configuration of the magnets) and rotating speed on energy generation of the PEG was investigated experimentally. The research results show that there are several optimal rotating speeds for the PEG to achieve peak voltage at speed range of 0 to 1390r/min. Under a given number of magnets fixed on the end of the piezo-beam, the peak voltages rise with the increasing of rotating magnets number and rotating speed. At 636r/min, the achieved peek voltages from the PEG with 1/2/4 rotating magnets are 12.1/15.2/20.0V respectively. Besides, the configuration modes of rotating magnets and the fixed magnets (repulsion, attraction, or repulsion-attraction) exert great influence on the peak voltage and the relative optimal rotating speeds. Taking a PEG with 2 rotating magnets for example, the 4th peek voltages and the relative optimal rotating speeds for the PEG under exciting mode of repulsion/attraction//repulsion-attraction are 12.6/15.0/16.4 V and 552/528/492 r/min respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

477-481

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Salem Saadon, Othman Sidek. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52: 500-504.

Google Scholar

[2] Adnan Harb. Energy harvesting: State-of-the-art. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36: 2641-2654.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.014

Google Scholar

[3] Lei Gua, Carol Livermore. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 97(8): 081904(3pp).

Google Scholar

[4] S PRIYA, C-T CHEN, D FYE, et al. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2005, 44(3): L104–L107.

Google Scholar

[5] Marian Keck. Proc. of IEEE Sensors, 2007, p: 1299-1302.

Google Scholar

[6] Cam Minh Tri Tien, Nam Seo Goo. Proc. of SPIE, 2010, 7643: 371-379.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Janphuang, D. Isarakorn, D. Briand, N.F. de Rooij. 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, 2011, p: 735-738.

DOI: 10.1109/transducers.2011.5969852

Google Scholar

[8] B. Cavallier, P. Berthelot, H. Nouira, et al. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005, 2: 943-945.

Google Scholar

[9] Kan Junwu, Tang Kehong, Wang Shuyun, et al. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2008, 16(1): 71-75.

Google Scholar

[10] Tang Lihua, Yang Yaowen. Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 101(2012), p.094102.

Google Scholar

[11] Kan Junwu, Wang Shuyun, Peng Shaofeng, Zhang Zhonghua, Zeng Ping, Cheng Guangming, Fu Xiaoqing. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2011, 19(9): 2108-2116.

Google Scholar