The Status Analysis of Constitutive Relation and Parameters of Soil Dynamics

Abstract:

This article describes the research progress and the development situation of soil dynamics. The soil dynamic constitutive model, dynamic test methods and research status of dynamic parameters are mainly discussed. Finally, some existing problems on the study of soil dynamic characteristics are proposed.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 395-396)
• Pages: 503-510
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.395-396.503
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Cong Cai*, Yong Ding Tian, Ling Zhi Cui, Jia Qi Zhang, Chao Chao Ma
• Keywords: Constitutive Relation, Parameter, Soil Dynamics

References

[1] Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K. Modulus anddamping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils [J]. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1986, 112(11): 1016–1032.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016)

[2] Hardin BO, Black WL. Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay [J]. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(2): 353–369.

DOI: 10.1061/jsfeaq.0001100

[3] YUAN Xiao-Ming, SUN Jing. Model of maximum dynamic shear modulus of sand under anisotropic consolidation and revision of Hardin's formula [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(3): 264–269.

[4] FEI Han-Chang, Wu Yiwei. Huangpu River Bridge site dynamic characteristics of soil[A]. Third National Soil Dynamics Conference [C]. Shanghai, Tongji University Press, 1990. 303 – 308.

[5] CHEN Guo-Xing, Hsieh, Zhang Kexu of soil dynamic modulus and damping ratio of the empirical estimation [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1995, 15 (1): 73 – 84.

[6] GU Chuan, CAI Yuan Qiang, Wan Jun, Yang fang, Hu Xiuqing. Dynamic triaxial tests of saturated soft clay, the pore pressure characteristic and its influence on the effective stress path [J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 2012, and 31 (6) 1290-1296.

[7] ZHANG Jun. Cyclic stress history of small strain shear modulus of soil powder [D]. Hangzhou: zhejiang university, (2010).

[8] ZHANG Ke-Xu. Soil dynamics[M]. Bei Jing: Earthquake Press, (1989).

[9] BAI L D. Preloading effects on dynamic sand behavior byresonant column tests [D]. Berlin: Technical University Berlin, (2011).

[10] CHEN Guo-Xing LiuXueZhu, Zhu Dinghua Hu Qingxing. Nanjing recently deposited soil dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of the experimental study [J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering. 2006; 1403-1410.

DOI: 10.1142/9789812701602_0023

[11] SHANG Shou Ping, Lu Huaxi, Ren Hui, Li Gang. Silty clay Experimental dynamic shear modulus comparative study [J]. Geotechnical Engineering 2006 (03): 410-414.

[12] Kagawa T. Moduli and Damping Factors of Soft Marine Clays. ASCE. Vol. 118. No. GT9. pp.1360-1375. (1992).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1992)118:9(1360)

[13] SHEN Zhu-Jiang A calculation of liquefaction deformation equivalent viscoelastic model [A]. The fourth asian-australasian conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering [C]. Beijing: Construction industry Press, 1986. 199 ~ 207.

[14] ISHIBASHI I, ZHANG X. Unified dynamic shear modulus and damping ratios of sand and clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1993, 33(1): 182-191.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.33.182

[15] BORDEN R H, SHAOL, GUPTA A. Dynamic properties of piedmont residual soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1996, 122(10): 813 – 821.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1996)122:10(813)

[16] ZHANG J F, ANDRUS R D, JUANG C H. Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships[J]. Journa of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131(4): 453 -464.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453)