Quantitative Analysis of the Defect Dimension for Fracture Surface of Fracture Splitting Connecting Rod

Article Preview

Abstract:

The fracture surface of con-rod is difficult to be quantitatively described due to its indented macro morphology. Thus, the range of fracture surface defect dimension has no uniform standard. In order to solve this question, 3D software about the digital fracture surface reconstruction was developed by combining the fracture splitting technology of con-rod with reverse engineering, which realized the reproduction of its morphology and completed the real area calculation of the surface. The results show that the fracture surface area processed by fracture splitting is 13.1% larger than that of the plane processed by machining. It represents that the defect dimension range of fracture surface is improved compared to empirical value without reducing the bearing capacity and usability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1059-1063

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gu Z, Yang S, Ku S, et al.: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 25(9-10), pp.883-887.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhigang Yang, Shuqing Kou, Xianguo Zhang, et al: Vehicle Engine, 2007(05), pp.73-77.

Google Scholar

[3] Zheng Cao, Wanfu Shi, Ganli Wang, et al.: Automobile Technology and Material, 2000(12), pp.24-27.

Google Scholar

[4] Shuqing Kou, Shenhua Yang, Yong Zhao, et al.: Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2004(01), pp.85-90.

Google Scholar

[5] Kanninen M F, Popelar C L. ADVANCED FRACTURE MECHANICS [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Pr, (1985).

Google Scholar

[6] Yingfeng Hu: MANUFACTURING AUTOMATION, 2009(09), pp.135-137.

Google Scholar

[7] Xiangang Jiang. Engineering Software Design of Reconstruction and Display of 3-D Data Field [M]. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Zhongqi Sheng, Gangqi Cai: Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2001(06), pp.102-103.

Google Scholar