Load Distribution of Ball Screw with Contact Angle Variation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on existing analytical models, an improved model was developed to predict load distribution of ball screw more accurately. In this model, variation of contact angle is considered. The results of this model demonstrate that the load distribution of ball screw is not uniform and load distribution curve falls from the position near the load to further. Downward trend is more marked when the variation of contact angle is introduced into the model. The larger ratio of helical pitch to screw diameter is, the worse the nonuniformity of load distribution is. This will impair the stiffness of ball screw. It is found that the calculated results are significant to ball screw design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

435-440

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] MC Lin, B Ravani, et al. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 116 (1994): p.849–55.

Google Scholar

[2] MC Lin, B Ravani, et al. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 116 (1994): p.856–61.

Google Scholar

[3] HT Huang, B Ravani. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. (1997): p.119: 8–14.

Google Scholar

[4] CC Wei, Lin JF, et al. Tribology International, Vol. 42(2009): 1816-1831.

Google Scholar

[5] K Nakashima. and K Takafuji. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, JSME, Part C, Vol. 54 (1987): pp.2181-2187.

Google Scholar

[6] XS Mei, M. Tsutsumi, et al. Mechanism and machine theory, Vol. 38(2003): pp.1257-1269.

Google Scholar

[7] CC Wei, JF Lin. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 125(2003): p.717–33.

Google Scholar

[8] TY Chen, PH Hou, JY Chiu. Optics and lasers in engineering, Vol. 38(2002): pp.87-95.

Google Scholar

[9] CJ Chen, W Jywe, et al. Physics Procedia, Vol. 19(2011): p.36–42.

Google Scholar

[10] K Takafuji and K Nakashima. Engineering for industry, Vol. 33 (1990): pp.620-626.

Google Scholar