Gas Mixture Recognition Method with New Hybrid Architecture

Article Preview

Abstract:

The quantification accuracy of the gas mixture recognizing is greatly dependent on the gas sensor array signal processing method. The paper reports the new hybrid architecture with two main stages for gas mixture recognition. The first stage combine the principal component analysis (PCA) and back propagation neural network (BPNN) to qualitative identify the gas mixture, and the second stage composed of the independent component analysis (ICA) and BP sub networks to quantify the gas concentrations. The hybrid architecture and three other commonly used methods of PCA+BPNN, ICA+BPNN, and ICA+BP sub networks were respectively applied in binary gas mixture quantification based on the same gas sensor array, and results show that the hybrid architecture has the lowest quantitative recognition errors and fast converge speed comparing with the other methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

604-609

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Krishna Persaud and George Dodd; Journal of Nature Vol. 299 (1982), pp.352-354.

Google Scholar

[2] J.W. Gardner and P.N. Bartlett; Journal of Sensor Actuators B Vol. 18 (1994), pp.211-220.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Troy Nagle1, Susan S. Schiffman and Ricardo Gutierrez Osuna1; Journal of Spectrum IEEE Vol. 35 (1998) pp.22-34.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ampuero and J. O. Bosset; Journal of Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Vol. 94 (2003), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[5] Lin-nan Yang, Lin Peng, Li-min Zhang, Li-lian Zhang and Shi-sheng Yang; Journal of Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Vol. 68 (2009), pp.200-206.

Google Scholar

[6] A.K. Jain, R.P.W. Duin and J. Mao; Journal of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Vol. 22(2000), pp.4-37.

Google Scholar

[7] Gutierrez-Osuna, R; Journal of IEEE sensors Vol. 2(2002), pp.189-202.

Google Scholar

[8] Aapo Hyvarinen and Erkki Oja; Journal of Neural Networks Vol. 13 (2000), pp.411-430.

Google Scholar

[9] Aapo Hyvarinen; Journal of Neural Computing Surveys Vol. 2 (1999), pp.94-128.

Google Scholar

[10] Karhunen J; Journal of IEEE Trans Neural Network Vol. 8 (1997), pp.486-504.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Balasubramanian, S. Panigrahi, C.M. Logue, C. Doetkott, M. Marchello and J.S. Sherwood; Journal of Food Control Vol. 19 (2008), pp.236-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.007

Google Scholar

[12] He Xiaochuan, Wei Shoushui and Wang Ruiqing; 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE 08), Inst. of Elec. and Elec. Eng. Computer Society Press (2008), pp.490-493.

Google Scholar

[13] S.M. Moore, J.W. Gardner and E.L. Hines; Journal of Sensors and Actuators B Vol. 15 (1993), pp.344-348.

Google Scholar

[14] Xiu-Kun Wang and Xiao-Feng Zhang; Journal of Computer Science Vol. 28 (2001), pp.61-63.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Martín Negri and S. Reich; Journal of Sensor Actuators B: Chem Vol. 75 (2001), pp.172-178.

Google Scholar

[16] J Yu, ZA Tang, GZ Yan, P.C.H. Chan and Z.X. Huang; Journal of Sensor Actuators B Vol. 139 (2009), pp.346-352.

Google Scholar

[17] Hyva¨rinen; Journal of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks Vol. 10 (1999), pp.626-634.

Google Scholar