The Transfer of Development Rights for the Regeneration of Brownfield Sites

Article Preview

Abstract:

The redevelopment of brownfield sites requires the involvement of the skills and resources of the private operator for the technical risks associated with the transformation and the high financial commitments. In the current scarcity of public resources, among the most widely used schemes there is one that provides development rights of equivalent value to locate on the areas to recover in order to compensate the amounts incurred by the private investor. The model developed and tested in this paper deals with this theme. It produces a wide range of possible urban parameters to attribute to the regenerated areas, upon which it is possible to develop the negotiation between the public and private sectors in order to define the solution to be implemented. The experimental results of the model highlight the usefulness of activating regeneration initiatives, and in particular of contaminated sites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

971-978

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.T. Barrese, The transfer of development rights: empirical evidence from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Review of Regional Studies, vol. 12, 2 (1982), pp.50-57.

DOI: 10.52324/001c.7974

Google Scholar

[2] R. Curto, E. Fregonara, Decision tools for investments in the real estate sector with risk and uncertainty elements, Jahrbuch fur Regional Wissenschaft, vol. 19, 1 (1999), pp.55-85.

Google Scholar

[3] P.J. Clinch, E. O' Neill, Assessing the relative merits of development charges and transferable development rights in an uncertain world, Urban Studies, vol. 47, 4 (2010), pp.891-911.

DOI: 10.1177/0042098009352365

Google Scholar

[4] F. Deng, Land development right and collective ownership in China, Post-Communist Economies, vol. 25, 2 (2013), pp.190-205.

DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2013.787739

Google Scholar

[5] U. Ferber, D. Grimski, Brownfields and redevelopment of urban areas. Austrian Federal Environment Agency, CLARINET project (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] M.D. Kaplowitz, P.L. Machemer, R. Pruetz, Planners' experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States, Land Use Policy, vol. 25, 3 (2008), pp.378-387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.07.004

Google Scholar

[7] C. Lee, I modelli di pianificazione, Marsilio Editori, Venezia, (1974).

Google Scholar

[8] B. Manganelli, P. Pontrandolfi, A. Azzato, B. Murgante, Urban Residential Land Value Analysis: The Case of Potenza, in: B. Murgante et al., ICCSA 2013, Part IV (2013), LNCS 7974, pp.304-314.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_22

Google Scholar

[9] V. McConnell, M. Walls, U.S. experience with transferable development rights, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 3, 2 (2009), pp.288-303.

DOI: 10.1093/reep/rep008

Google Scholar

[10] C.M. Torre, P. Balena, R. Zito, An Automatic Procedure to Select Areas for Transfer Development Rights in the Urban Market, in: B. Murgante et al., ICCSA 2012, Part I (2012), LNCS 7333, pp.583-598.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_44

Google Scholar