Research on Measure Method for Reconfigurability

Article Preview

Abstract:

Some certain criteria will be required to evaluate the reconfiguration of a system or an individual as well as its reconfiguration value. In the paper a methodology on evaluating the reconfigurability has been proposed. It was intended for the paper to study quantitatively and qualitatively the feasibility of the system to reconfigurate. The reconfiguration distance has been put forward based on the information distance and its calculation model has been given. In the paper, reconfiguration distance was proposed to measure the reconfiguration value. This method can be used to determine the level of its reconfigurability, providing a basis for decision-makers. For the system's or individual's reconfiguration, the focus of this paper is the determination of indicators to measure the reconfiguration, i.e., costs of reconfiguration, and reconfiguration realizability used to describe the obstacles, costs needed to pay, and the degree to realize when reconfigurating the system or individual, which will further improve the reconfiguration theory. Only thus the truly meaningful reconfiguration can be achieved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2501-2504

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Urbani and S.P. Negri: Production System Modelling for the Evaluation of the Degree of Reconfigurability (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, Part III: 239-257).

Google Scholar

[2] Carls Riba R., Roberto Pérez R., Horacio Ahuett G. , etc.: CDVE 2006, LNCS 4101, p.234.

Google Scholar

[3] Maier Speredelozzi, Valerie: Mechanical Engineering in The University of Michigan (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kia a, A. Baboli b, *, N. Javadian c, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam d, etc.: Computers & Operations Research Vol. 39 (2012), p.2642.

Google Scholar

[5] Hoda,A. ElMaraghy: Int J Flex Manuf Syst Vol. 17 (2006), p.261.

Google Scholar

[6] MEHRABI MG, ULSOYAG, KOREN Y: International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management Vol. 1(1) (2000), p.113.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Zh. Luo 1, X.J. Xue1, J.P. Liu 2, H. Tang3, B.H. Zhou3, L.Q. Zhu4: Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition) Vol. 44(5) (2004),p.577. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] F.J. Liang, R.X. Ning: China mechanical engineering Vol. 14(23) (2003), p.2023.(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Tullio Tolio, Marcello Urgo: Journal of Manufacturing Systems Vol. 32(2) (2013), p.325.

Google Scholar

[10] Hidenori Ishihara*, Toshio Fukuda: Robotics and Autonomous Systems Vol. 19 (1996), p.105.

Google Scholar

[11] Sara Modarres Razavi a, *, Di Yuan a, b, Fredrik Gunnarson b, Johan Moe b. : Computer Networks Vol. 56 (2012), p.157.

Google Scholar

[12] Taher Niknam a, Ehsan Azadfarsani b, Masoud Jabbari c, *: Energy Conversion and Management Vol. 54 (2012), p.7.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Ch. Wang: Information distance and information (Science Press, Beijing, China, 2006).

Google Scholar

[14] José M. Merigó, Y.J. Xu, Sh. Zh. Zeng: Knowledge-Based Systems Vol. 40 (2013), p.81.

Google Scholar

[15] P.I. Chen, Sh.J. Lin, Y. Ch. Chu: Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 38 (2011), p.7349.

Google Scholar