A Relationship between Parameters of Two Representations of Discrete LTI ARMA System Model and the Corresponding Device Fingerprints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Device fingerprints has potential to identify the source of digital communication information. Although identifying transmitters with their fingerprints remains an arduous question, fusion identification with multiple device fingerprints is a feasible methodology. In this paper, a relationship between parameters of two representations of discrete-time linear time-invariant (LTI) autoregressive moving average (ARMA) system model is derived which has definite physical meaning. With the relationship, a novel linear device fingerprints is proposed which may enlarge the inter-class distance of the transmitters to be identified. The proposed device fingerprints can be used for fusion identification of network devices and the corresponding ARMA systems especially for that with slight differences.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1267-1273

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Simon, H. : Communication Systems 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York(2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Shigenobu, M., etc. : An Artificial Fingerprint Device(AFD): A Study of Identification Number Applications Utilizing Characteristics Variation of Polycrystalline Silicon TFTs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. Vol. 50(6), 1451-1458(2003).

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2002.808526

Google Scholar

[3] R.M. Gerdes, T.E. Daniels, M. Mina, and S.F. Russell. Device Identification via Analog Signal Fingerprinting : A Matched Filter Approach. Annual Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security(NDSS'2006), San Diego, California USA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] D.G. Lee, J. -W. Han, D.S. Park, and I.Y. Lee. Intelligent Pervasive Network Authentication: S/Key Based Device Authentication. Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2009. CCNC 2009, 6th IEEE, 2009. pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2009.4784994

Google Scholar

[5] RANDALL, W. K., MICHAEL, A. T., MICHAEL, J. M., Application of wavelet denoising to improve OFDM-based signal detection and classification. Security and Communication Networks, 2010, vol. 3, pp.71-82.

DOI: 10.1002/sec.115

Google Scholar

[6] M. Hamdi, A. Meddeb-Makhlouf, and N. Boudriga. Multilayer Statistical Intrusion Detection in Wireless Networks. Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, (2009).

DOI: 10.1155/2009/368589

Google Scholar

[7] A. Candore, O. Kocabas, and F. Koushanfar. Robust stable radiometric fingerprinting for wireless devices. Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, 2009, HOST'09. IEEE International Workshop on, 2009, pp.43-49.

DOI: 10.1109/hst.2009.5224969

Google Scholar

[8] H.L. Yuan, Z.H. Bao, A.Q. Hu, Power ramped-up preamble RF fingerprints of wireless transmitters. Radioengineering. Vol. 20(3).

Google Scholar

[9] Kenneth I. Talbot, Paul R. Duley, and Martin H. Hyatt. Specific Emitter Identification and Verification. Technology Review Journal. Spring/Summer 2003, Vol. 11(11), pp.113-133.

Google Scholar

[10] HONGLIN, Y., AIQUN, H., Preamble-based detection of Wi-Fi transmitter RF fingerprints. Electronics Letters, 2010, vol. 46, pp.1165-1167.

DOI: 10.1049/el.2010.1220

Google Scholar