Decision Algorithm of Surrounding Rock Grades Based on the Variable Fuzzy Sets

Abstract:

From the analysis of the character of elastic wave through a rock medium, According to the safety driving problems faced in tunnel construction geological prediction, using TSP test data inversion of rock hardness, integrity and water characteristic parameters, the determination model of surrounding rock classification based on the variable fuzzy sets for surrounding rock classification. You can use the existing geological forecast means the achievements, with no increase in the additional cost method, the use of advanced, scientific method, in situ on surrounding rock grade determination, not only reduced the economic investment, and reduce the detection procedure, which have greatly improved invest. From detection technology investment and time efficiency compared to the original method, to guide the construction, save the cost, construction scheme design plays a positive role. This method not only has the profound theory value, but also has significant social benefits and huge economic benefits.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 416-417)
• Pages: 1758-1764
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.416-417.1758
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Qian Jin Zhang, Jin Yang
• Keywords: Grade of Surrounding Rock, Multiwave Relation, TSP, Variable Fuzzy Sets

References

[1] Fu Bingjun, the international development trend of rock mechanics [J]. Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1997, 16 (4): 195-196.

[2] Liu Baoshen, Utilization of underground space in urban ground and several problems [J], Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18 (l): 109-111.

[3] Du Wei Ping, Tunnel excavation laws of geological disasters and Prevention Countermeasures [M], Changsha: Central South University, (2001).

[4] Huang Runqiu, Wang Xianneng, Deep tunnel engineering major disaster geological problems [J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 1998, 4 (4): 21-24.

[5] Wang Mengshu, Sustainable development of the six puzzles and countermeasures [J]. Tunnel construction, 2002, 22 (2): 1-3.

[6] National Natural Science Foundation of the Faculty of Engineering and Materials, Significant Hazard and Control Engineering Demonstration Report [R], Beijing: National Natural Science Foundation of China, (2000).

[7] Sun Guangzhong, Military are mountain tunnel geological prediction Rapid Construction Guide [M]. Beijing: China Railway Press, (1990).

[8] Madani, H. Tunneling, seconded. Tehran Polyteehnie University Press, Tehran (inPersian), (1998).

[9] Sudo, H, Tanaka, T, Kobayashi, T, et al. Permeability imaging in granitic rocks based on surface resistivity Profiling [J]. ExPloration GeoPhysies, 2004, 35: 56-61.

DOI: 10.1071/eg04056

[10] Tsai, DT, Hwang, FL, Shih, HM, et al. 2005. Application of tunnel seismie Predietion for the Hsuehshan Tunnel. In: InternationalSymPosium.

[11] Grodner, M., 2001, Delineation of rock burst fraetures with ground Penetrating radar in the Witwatersrand Basin, SouthAfriea. International Journal of Rock Mechanies and Mining Sciences 38, 885-891.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(01)00054-5

[12] Zhang Pingsong, WU Jiansheng, China tunnel and lane seismic analysis of advanced detection technology [J], Advances in Earth Science 2006, 21 (10): 1033-1038.

[13] Dickmann, T., and B. Sander, Drivage concurrent tunnel seismic Prediction: Felsbau Rock and soil Engineering, 1996, 14, 406-411.

[14] Amberg Measuring Technique Ltd. ComParison of Various Tunnel Geological Forecast Techniques [M], (2003).

[15] Andisheh A., Ali M. Prediction of geological hazardous zones in front of a tunnel face using TSP-203 and artificial neural networks. Tunnelling and Underground Spaee Technology, 2008, 23: 711-717.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2008.01.001

[16] Inazaki, T., IsahaiH. Kawamura5., Et al. Stepwise application of horizontal seismic profiling for tunnel prediction ahead of the face: The Leading Edge, 1999, 18, 1429-1431.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1438246